None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if knee movement and muscle activity of patients implanted with a medial pivot prosthesis design is more normal compared to crucial-retaining or posterior-stabilized designs during locomotion.
Interventions
1. Patients implanted with a medial pivot prosthesis design, an cruciate sacrificing design characterised by high-conformity in the medial compartment (socket on the insert, as well as anterior and posterior lips to prevent femoral translation) and a flatter tibial surface on the lateral side to facilitate tibiofemoral rotation with an axis located on the medial side. Alternative designs such as cruciate-retaining (CR) do not feature medial-lateral differences in geometry and retain the posterior-cruciate ligament. Posterior stabilized knees (PS) also sacrifice the cruciate ligaments, but maintain stability through a post and cam system. 2. Each participant will be followed up for a one-hour session at a minimum follow-up of 12months post knee replacement surgery.
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Patients receiving a knee replacement a minimum of 12months prior to testing BMI <35kg/m2 Able to walk on a treadmill for >120sec; step up/down on a 20cm step
Exclusion criteria
Primary language other than English Pregnant women Children or young adults Persons diagnosed with neurological disorders that would preclude safely performing locomotion in a laboratory environment Persons with intellectual or mental impairments People highly dependent on medical care