Skip to content

Behavioural Balloon Dilatation in Upper Esophageal Sphincter (UES) Dysfunction

Effects of Behavioural Balloon Dilatation on UES opening diameter and duration and UES pressures during swallowing in participants with UES Dysfunction

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12616000570482
Enrollment
20
Registered
2016-05-03
Start date
2016-08-08
Completion date
2018-05-31
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Medical management of impairment in the UES has traditionally consisted of the surgical option of cricopharyngeal myotomy, with variable efficacy. More conservative options include medical dilatation, botulinum toxin injections and swallowing rehabilitation exercises carried out by the speech-language pathologist. Behavioural balloon dilatation, a conservative approach, was first documented in the 1990s by Japanese researchers. Frequently used in Asian countries as an adjunct to swallowing rehabilitation programs, the protocol for balloon rehabilitation has varied across studies, with a paucity of data available on long-term effects of UES dysfunction and UES dysfunction caused by disorders other than neurological diseases. This study will evaluate the short-term and longer-term efficacy, safety and tolerability of balloon dilatation as a behavioural treatment approach for patients with UES dysfunction. Twenty patients with UES dysfunction, demonstrated on videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) and high-resolution manometry (HRM), will be recruited to undergo a two-week intensive behavioural balloon dilatation protocol with a follow-up session at three months after therapy. The protocol is based on the concept of retraining the response of the UES via a series of behavioural therapy sessions, rather than just a single medical, mechanical expansion of the UES with the balloon. A combination of two main methods of self-administered balloon dilatation will be carried out with an inflated urethral balloon catheter: 1) anterograde method, where an inflated balloon is “swallowed” through the UES with aid of a guidewire; 2) retrograde method, where the catheter is inserted below the UES before inflating the balloon, then pulled up through the UES in synchrony with dry swallows. The retrograde method will be implemented from the first day of treatment and the anterograde method will only be added on in the second week of treatment. Dilatation will be performed 20 to 30 times in total within each session, two sessions a day, five days a week for two weeks, before re-evaluation of swallowing function. Initial balloon sizes will be determined based on UES opening size on VFSS. Subsequent increases in size will be guided by pressures that are generated when the balloon passes the UES, paired with patient comfort levels, to minimise the risk of mucosal trauma. Data analysis will compare pre and post- therapy UES opening diameter and duration during swallowing as well as UES resting pressure, nadir relaxation pressure and UES relaxation duration to determine the efficacy of behavioural balloon dilatation in treating UES dysfunction. Change in feeding status is also of interest, to determine if improvements in VFSS and HRM measures lead to functional changes in swallowing. Maintenance effects of therapy will also be examined with data provided at the three-month follow-up.

Interventions

Each participant will undergo 6 assessments and 10 treatment sessions over a period of 4 months at the Rose Centre for Stroke Recovery and Research, University of Canterbury (see attachment “Study procedures” for a diagram detailing procedures that will occur at each session). Each session is expected to last approximately one hour. Some of the assessment and treatment sessions have been combined – these sessions will last approximately 1.5 hours. Each session will be an individual face-to-face

Each participant will undergo 6 assessments and 10 treatment sessions over a period of 4 months at the Rose Centre for Stroke Recovery and Research, University of Canterbury (see attachment “Study procedures” for a diagram detailing procedures that will occur at each session). Each session is expected to last approximately one hour. Some of the assessment and treatment sessions have been combined – these sessions will last approximately 1.5 hours. Each session will be an individual face-to-face session. They will be delivered by a speech language therapist with a minimum of 5 years’ experience. Each participant will undergo two baseline assessments with the Timed Water Swallow Test (TWST), the Test of Mastication and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS). These are screening tests where the participant will be observed while drinking a fixed amount of water and when eating a cracker. The participant will then undergo High-Resolution Manometry (HRM) and Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study (VFSS) to document UES function prior to therapy. At the second baseline assessment session, if measures on HRM and the screening tests remain similar, VFSS will be omitted to limit radiation exposure. After the two baseline assessment sessions, a two-week behavioural dilatation treatment program will then commence. The intervention under investigation is behavioural balloon dilatation. It involves oral insertion of a urethral balloon catheter without sedation to the upper esophageal sphincter (UES). Two balloon dilatation methods will be carried out for each participant: a. the retrograde method – the balloon catheter is inserted to under the UES before the balloon is inflated with air and pulled through the UES in synchrony with swallowing (20 repetitions) b. the anterograde method –the balloon portion of the catheter is inflated with air before the participant swallows it down past the UES with the aid of a guidewire (10 repetitions). The retrograde method will be implemented from the first week of treatment. The anterograde method will be added on only in the second week. Each time a new method of dilatation is taught, the first dilatation will be done with visualisation by VFSS to mark how far the balloon catheter needs to be inserted. This will hence occur twice: once in the first retrograde dilatation attempt in the first week; the other in the first anterograde dilatation attempt in the second week. In subsequent dilatation attempts without VFSS, insertions will follow the markings made and the participant will be instructed to phonate after swallowing the catheter to ensure the catheter has not been inserted into the trachea. The regimen will hence consist of a total of twenty repetitions of balloon dilatation at each session, two sessions per day, five times per week for the first week. At the end of the first week, HRM will be carried out to chart progress before commencing the second week of treatment. It potentially may yield data that indicates which patients may or may not tolerate anterograde dilatation. The regimen then increases to thirty repetitions of balloon dilatation at each session, two sessions per day, five times per week for the second week. Patients are encouraged to perform self-dilatation of the UES. To rate the tolerability of the treatment program, participants will be asked to rate their comfort level on a visual analogue scale at one week into the treatment phase and again at immediately after treatment has ended. Initial balloon sizes will be determined by VFSS opening diameters measured from the baseline VFSS sessions. Balloon size will then gradually be increased based on patient comfort levels and intra-balloon pressures generated when the balloon passes the UES. Intra-balloon pressures will be measured throughout the whole dilatation session with a manometer connected to a laptop which will display pressures within the balloon on screen. Dou and colleagues (2012) reported that small increments in balloon size will lead to fewer side effects like bleeding from mucosal trauma. Typically intra-balloon pressures will be monitored to remain less than 20% above baseline pressures. If pressures stay within 20% of baseline pressures, balloon size will be increased by 0.5mm. The maximum balloon diameter will correspond to normative data of maximum UES diameter during swallowing (normative data is available in Leonard and Kendall, 2013). Once this maximum diameter is achieved, therapy will continue at this balloon size until the end. This is to minimise the risk of bleeding from over-expansion. At the end of the two-week of treatment, the TWST, TOMASS, HRM and VFSS will be repeated to document change in UES opening and manometric pressures from treatment. At two weeks and at three months after treatment has terminated, the TWST, TOMASS and HRM will be repeated to assess short and long-term effects of treatment. Once again, VFSS will be omitted if HRM measures remain stable to minimise radiation exposure. Functional change in swallowing function will be monitored via scoring on the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), a 7-point scale based on details of a participant’s feeding status and amount of intake. The Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10), a short questionnaire that assesses change in patient-reported dysphagia symptoms and severity, and quality of life, will also be administered at each session. Based on previous research indicating that reflux symptoms may increase after oesophageal dilatation, it would be of interest to investigate if laryngopharyngeal reflux, in particular, will be affected after behavioural dilatation. Change in symptoms will be tracked using the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI).

Sponsors

Seh Ling Kwong
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomised trial
Intervention model
Single group
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

- Able to give informed consent - Diagnosis of UES dysfunction evidenced by reduced UES opening and pyriform residue post swallow on VFS and/ or - Abnormal UES opening pressures on HRM

Exclusion criteria

- Are medically unstable - Have cognitive or language impairments - Have abnormalities in the head and neck region - Have undergone therapy for head and neck cancer including extirpative surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy - Are currently on tracheostomy - Have known upper oesophageal abnormalities e.g. active inflammation, tumours, perforation (not including reflux) - Have known nasal abnormalities that precludes use of manometry - Have known bleeding tendencies - Are currently undergoing any other forms of swallowing management for UES dysfunction

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026