None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
Over 40% of older people living in the community fall each year. In clinical practice, recent guidelines recommend that older people be regularly asked about falls and their circumstances. Ascertaining falls is also important to measure the success of any intervention. In research settings previous studies have found that asking about falls 3- or 12-monthly results in under reporting of falls compared with a daily calendar returned monthly with telephone or paper-based questionnaire follow-up to determine the circumstances of falls. This method of a daily falls calendar and monthly follow-up by questionnaire or telephone call has been well validated and is now considered to be the gold standard in falls ascertainment. However, this method is labour and cost intensive as every month there are postage costs, need to manually check that the calendar has been returned (previous studies have reported 30% need follow-up), telephoning to determine circumstances of falls and data or medical file entry by a research assistant or clinician. Therefore there is an important need to improve the way falls ascertainment is conducted. We aim to undertake the world first testing of a novel emailed electronic falls ascertainment tool (TASeFALL) that reminds participants to complete the electronic questionnaire, with responses automatically fed into a database or clinicians email.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
>=60 years Attending the Menzies Institute for Medical Research Blood Pressure Clinic
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Dementia (Self-reported history of dementia or less than 18/30 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) – routinely obtained at the blood pressure clinic); no email access or severe visual impairment so as unable to complete a questionnaire.