None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
The Effects of Neuro-rehabilitation on Down’s Syndrome patients. There are indication to include the Bobath Methods and SI Method for individual therapeutic program of a child with Down's syndrome. Among the respondents (G1, G2, G3) we want to improve postural tone, posture, motor skills and some fine motor skills regulated by the processes of sensory integration. Probably there is improvement in the cognitive, mainly in the area of visual perception. Neurodevelopmental therapy may enhance the therapeutic effect. The study attempted to assess the relation between the functionality of the cognitive processes and the level of postural tension integration in children with Down’s Syndrome (cognitive goal) and evaluate the usefulness of various neuro-rehabilitation methods as well as additional means in rehabilitation of children with Down’s Syndrome (practical goal). The aim of the study was to form a provisional validation of the use of neuro-rehabilitation methods in special schooling, especially among the group of children with Down’s Syndrome. The following hypotheses were taken into consideration: - Improper integration of postural tension may affect the functioning of cognitive processes and motor skills - Directed neuro-rehabilitation may contribute to the improvement of quality of cognitive functions and motor skills In order to formulate general aims of the study we decided to solve several questions which have been listed below: - is there a relation between the quality of postural tension and posture, motor skills, level of sensory integration, visual perception, awareness and higher cognitive propcesses? - Does neuro-rehabilitation positively affect posture, motor skills, sensory integration, visual perception, concentration and higher cognitive processes? - Which rehabilitation methods (NDT-Bobath, Sensomotoric integration, dynamic orthosis DUNAG 01, kinesiology taping) are the most effective?
Interventions
The three intervention groups received neuro-rehabilitation therapy for 10 months, whilst the control group received standard therapy based on the curriculum of the Polish special education system. The standard therapy comprised physical education and adapted physical activity classes but did not include neuro-rehabilitation or physiotherapy. Group (G1) received one hour per week of neuro-rehabilitation therapy based on the Bobath Method and the SI Method. Group 2 (G2) received one hour per week of neuro-rehabilitation therapy based on the Bobath Method and the SI Method and additional, Children with Down’s syndrome played team sports and movement games wearing the dynamic orthosis during the hour after a neuro- rehabilitation session. Group 3 (G3) received one hour per week neuro-rehabilitation therapy based on the Bobath Method and the SI Method and additional, Children with Down’s syndrome played team sports and movement games wearing the dynamic orthosis during the hour after a neuro-rehabilitation session, and after it, therapy was supplemented and fixed by use of kinesiology tape. Application if kinesiology tape was held 4-6 days. The control group (G4) received one hour per week of general development and corrective gymnastics, conducted by physiotherapist or teacher of physical education, according to the curriculum in a special school. Each test group received the intervention of one on one (physiotherapist – person with DS). The aim of Bobath Method [Neurodevelopmental Treatment (NDT)] was normalisation of postural tension, which affects development of central stabilisation. Modification of alignment of various segments of the body, focused on crucial points (head, shoulder and pelvic girdle) and control points (upper and lower limbs) was used to promote changes in postural and motor habits. Techniques included provision of effective support as well as basic (suppression and priming) and special (pressure, traction, placing, alternative tapping, inhibitory tapping, pressure tapping, sweep tapping, push-pull) techniques. Physio balls, rollers, mattresses and mirrors were used as required. The intervention also included techniques based on the SI Method. The main objective of this type of neuro-rehabilitation is to provide controlled exposure to sensory stimuli, especially vestibular, proprioceptive and haptic stimuli, to facilitate an adaptive reaction. To promote effective organisation of the CNS at synaptic level and thus ensure that sensory information is processed appropriately children are encouraged to perform complex motor tasks; the tasks are designed to be appealing to children. Therapy based on this technique is thought to improve sensorimotor coordination. Supports are adjusted according to the participant’s developmental level. Two-piece suit (shorts and jacket with elastic bands tension (Dunag) – Adeli suit. Elastic bands, are minimal tensioned from shoes, through the knees, hips, torso until your shoulders. Increased pressure on the articular surfaces cause proprioceptive stimulation in normal postural and motor patterns. As a result, a muscle activity directed against the acting force of gravity, resulting in normalization of muscular tension. Children suits enable the children to better “feel” their body, allowing them to function better. Children wearing these suits feel the tension on their body and this then also allows them to perform better at physical tasks. In study kinesiology taping was used try to enhance central stabilisation and lower limb control. To achieve the desired effect kinesiology taping was used in conjunction with techniques targeting use of the rectus abdominis muscle and obliquus externus abdominis muscle, mechanical correction of the position of the genu valgum, correction of the position of the Achilles tendon, functional application of kinesiology taping for the dorsiflexion of the foot, mechanical correction consisting in static stabilisation of flat-foot.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Persons diagnosed with Down’s syndrome and moderate intellectual disability. All participants had a certificate of disability issued by the Counselling Centre For Psychological and Pedagogical Problems stating that they had moderate intellectual disability (Wechsler IQ range: 54 35; ICD-10 F71).
Exclusion criteria
Persons with additional orthopaedic, neurological and genetic problems not associated with trisomy were excluded from the study.