Skip to content

Efficacy of ultrasound with or without nerve stimulator for infraclavicular brachial plexus block in children undergoing elective upper extremity orthopedic surgery

Efficacy of ultrasound with or without nerve stimulator for lateral sagittal infraclavicular brachial plexus block in children undergoing elective upper extremity orthopedic surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12615000856516
Enrollment
87
Registered
2015-08-17
Start date
2012-02-16
Completion date
2012-12-26
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Efficacy of nerve block with ultrasound and neurostimulator for children undergoing elective upper extremity orthopaedic surgery. The postoperative period and reliability of lateral sagittal infraclavicular block applications were investigated.

Interventions

Ultrasound with nerve stimulator for infraclavicular brachial plexus block in children undergoing elective upper extremity orthopedic surgery, intervention arm is the injured arm and did not apply anything to healty arm Lateral sagittal infraclavicular brachial plexus block with neurostimulator was applied to injured arm at a dose of 0.5 mg per kg levobupivacaine after general anesthesia induction and before surgery starts. The stimulator was initially adjusted to the parameters of 1.0 mA, 2 Hz,

Ultrasound with nerve stimulator for infraclavicular brachial plexus block in children undergoing elective upper extremity orthopedic surgery, intervention arm is the injured arm and did not apply anything to healty arm Lateral sagittal infraclavicular brachial plexus block with neurostimulator was applied to injured arm at a dose of 0.5 mg per kg levobupivacaine after general anesthesia induction and before surgery starts. The stimulator was initially adjusted to the parameters of 1.0 mA, 2 Hz, 0.1 ms. The insertion was performed with the sagittal plane in an anteroposterior manner at a 30–45 degrees angle from the intervention point to the ground where the patient was lying. When twitching response was obtained from one of the nerves , the current was reduced to 0.5 mA and this was considered to be an indicator of successful localization of nerve. To perform the ultrasound for the nerve block, a General Electric (GE) LOGIQ e model Linear Multifrequency 12L probe (GE Medical Systems, Phoenix-USA) was used. Multistimpleks (Pajunk, Germany) was used as nerve stimulator, and a custom needle specific to plexus anesthesia, Stimupleks A (B. Braun Melsungen AG, Japan) 21G, 50 mm was used as the needle. The USG probe was placed in the sagittal plane 1 cm under the conjunction of the clavicle and coracoid process. After the axillary artery and cords were identified, the stimulation needle was advanced (with the in-plane technique) to be in the same plane as the USG probe.

Sponsors

Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi
Lead SponsorHospital

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
2 Years to 15 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

patient group who would have an elective upper extremity orthopedic surgery

Exclusion criteria

neurological deficits, mental retardation, local anesthetic allergy, coagulopathy, under chronic analgesic treatment, skin infections at the site of the block, history of shoulder surgery on nerve block side, and not have family consent

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026