Skip to content

Beneficial effects of exercise done before prostate cancer surgery

Feasibility of Presurgical Exercise in Men With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Prostatectomy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12615000731594
Enrollment
10
Registered
2015-07-16
Start date
2011-06-21
Completion date
2013-08-01
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The primary objective was to determine the benefits of a pre-surgical exercise programme for prostate cancer patients scheduled for prostatectomy. It was hypothesised that: i) between baseline and pre-surgery, patients would demonstrate – higher physical functional performance, maintain higher levels of muscle strength and endurance, ii) during the weeks following surgery, patients would demonstrate – reduced physical functional performance, reduced muscular strength and endurance iii) between baseline and post-surgery, patients would demonstrate – improved recovery with a higher physical functional performance, maintain higher muscular strength and endurance.

Interventions

This study was a 6-week exercise intervention programme with assessments undertaken at three time-points: (1) baseline, (2) immediately pre-surgery and (3) 6-week post-surgery follow-up. The 6-week exercise programme commenced 6 weeks prior to the schedule surgery date. Patients undertook an exercise programme that consisted of two supervised clinic sessions per week. Each supervised exercise session took approximately 90 minutes to complete. Sessions commenced with a 5-minute warm-up consisting

This study was a 6-week exercise intervention programme with assessments undertaken at three time-points: (1) baseline, (2) immediately pre-surgery and (3) 6-week post-surgery follow-up. The 6-week exercise programme commenced 6 weeks prior to the schedule surgery date. Patients undertook an exercise programme that consisted of two supervised clinic sessions per week. Each supervised exercise session took approximately 90 minutes to complete. Sessions commenced with a 5-minute warm-up consisting of moderate level of aerobic exercise (~60% heart rate maximum (HRmax)), as well as stretching exercises of the major muscle groups: chest, shoulder, biceps, triceps, quadriceps, hamstrings and calf muscles. This was followed by a resistance-training regime that included a series of six exercises targeting the major muscles of the upper- and lower-body. Upper-limb exercises included chest press, seated row and lat pull-down. Lower-limb exercises were leg extension, leg curl and leg press. All exercises were performed through the full range of motion adhering to correct techniques. To ensure the progressive nature of the training programme, patients were encouraged to work past the repetition maximum (RM) prescribed, with resistance increased by 5 – 10% for the subsequent set/training sessions if they were able to exceed the number specified. Specifically, training phases were: week 1 – 2 (two sets 12 RM), week 3 (three sets of 10 RM), week 4 – 5 (three sets of 8 RM), week 6 (four sets of 6 RM). Each supervised session also included 15 minutes of exercises focusing on the trunk stabilising muscles. Patients performed three sets of three different exercises with a rest of 30 to 60 seconds between each set. These exercises consisted of planks (anterior abdominals), reverse bridge on Swiss ball (back extensors) and side planks (oblique abdominals) (Lehman, Hoda, & Oliver, 2005). The training load increased progressively by 5 – 10 seconds every week, starting with 10 seconds for the side planks and 30 seconds for the other trunk stabiliser exercises. Following the completion of the trunk stabiliser exercises, a further 20 minutes of aerobic exercise was undertaken. This included such specific activity as walking or jogging on a treadmill; cycling or rowing on a stationary ergometer; or exercising on a cross training machine depending on each patient’s preference. The target intensity was 60 – 80% of the estimated HRmax (220 – age in years) measured using heart rate monitors. The design criteria for the exercise intervention programme were to optimise the stimulus to the cardiovascular and neuromuscular systems while maximising compliance and retention. All sessions were conducted with one-on-one supervision by a qualified and accredited exercise physiologist who ensured safety and adherence to correct lifting techniques. Each session concluded with a 5-minute cool-down with stretching activities similar to the warm-up. Patients were provided with a session log in which to record their attendance, exercise weights, repetitions and sets.

Sponsors

Edith Cowan University
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomised trial
Intervention model
Single group
Primary purpose
Prevention
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

The eligibility inclusion criteria included at least seven weeks between diagnosis of localised prostate cancer and schedule prostatectomy date, and medical clearance to participate in an exercise programme from their general practitioner.

Exclusion criteria

The eligibility exclusion criteria included presence of any acute illness or any musculoskeletal, cardiovascular or neurological disorder that could inhibit them from exercising.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026