Skip to content

Haemodynamic and Respiratory Effects of Volume-Controlled Versus Pressure-Controlled Ventilation During Gynecologic Surgery

Haemodynamic and Respiratory Effects of Volume-Controlled Versus Pressure-Controlled Ventilation During Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery in Steep Trendelenburg Position

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12615000626561
Enrollment
60
Registered
2015-06-16
Start date
2019-06-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The aim of this stydy is to compare the effects of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation on cardiac output changes in patients undergoing robotic assisted gynecologic surgery in steep Trendelenburg position. Hypothesis: PCV may be a more effective method for maintaining more stable haemodynamics.

Interventions

Mechanical ventilation mode: PCV is an alternative mode of ventilation to VCV that is widely used in patients with elevated intraabdominal pressure and it has been shown to improve arterial oxygenation and decrease the peak airway pressure because of its decelerating inspiratory flow. Mechanical ventilation will be administered continuously from induction of anesthesia until extubation. In the pressure-controlled group, the peak airway pressure not exceeding 35 cmH2O will be set to provide a t

Mechanical ventilation mode: PCV is an alternative mode of ventilation to VCV that is widely used in patients with elevated intraabdominal pressure and it has been shown to improve arterial oxygenation and decrease the peak airway pressure because of its decelerating inspiratory flow. Mechanical ventilation will be administered continuously from induction of anesthesia until extubation. In the pressure-controlled group, the peak airway pressure not exceeding 35 cmH2O will be set to provide a tidal volume of 8 ml/kg, with and I:E ratio of 1:1,5. The respiratory rate will be adjusted to obtain an end-tidal CO2 of 35-40 cmH2O to be started with a respiratory rate of 12/min.

Sponsors

Sariyer Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorHospital

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Prevention
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

ASA physical status I-II Robotic gynaecologic surgery patients

Exclusion criteria

Valvular heart disease Abnormal regional wall contraction in echocardiography Pericardial disease Dilated cardiomyopathy Left atrial dialtation Left ventricular dilatation Obstructive/restrictive lung disease Body mass index>30 Eosophageal disease/dysphagia Blood loss leading more than %10 decrease in MAP

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026