Skip to content

Impact of the traditional blind technique versus the novel ultrasound guided technique for office fitting of intra-uterine contraceptive devices on success of insertion, time required and patient satisfaction in healthy women with regular menstrual periods

Impact of the traditional blind technique versus the novel ultrasound guided technique for office fitting of intra-uterine contraceptive devices on success of insertion, time required and patient satisfaction in healthy women with regular menstrual periods.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12615000526572
Enrollment
100
Registered
2015-05-26
Start date
2013-01-07
Completion date
2014-11-19
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

A new method of IUCD fitting using ultrasound guidance is compared to traditional blind method used for application to find out if it is more effective, and less time consuming.

Interventions

Intra-uterine contraceptive devices are inserted guided by transabdominal ultrasound with the probe held by an assistant through the procedure which require one to three minutes.

Sponsors

Mervat Sheikhelarab Elsedeek
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Prevention
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

request for contraception, regular menstrual periods, post-menstrual period, normal uterine cavity.

Exclusion criteria

Uterine pathology, amenorrheic women.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026