Skip to content

Patient function & pain control after total knee replacement: Is it improved by use of peri-articular or intra-articular infiltration ?

Comparison of postoperative pain control in patients receiving total knee replacement, using either periarticular or intraarticular local infiltration analgesia.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12615000488505
Enrollment
142
Registered
2015-05-18
Start date
2009-10-05
Completion date
2011-06-10
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Total knee replacement (TKR) is a common operation for knee arthritis. Effective pain control is important in post-operative recovery and rehabilitation. Recent studies have shown that injections of a mixture of medications into the tissues around the knee at the time of surgery can decrease the amount of pain experienced after surgery, leading to improved rehabilitation and a shorter hospital stay. We would like to determine if pain is better controlled with injections into the tissues around the knee joint (periarticular), compared to injections into the joint itself (intraarticular) at the time of total knee replacement surgery.

Interventions

One hundred and forty two consecutive patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty were enrolled. Patients were divided into 2 groups, a periarticular infiltration group (Group A) and an intraarticular injection group (Group B). Both groups received the same infiltrate – a combination of 30mg ketorolac, 500mcg of adrenaline, and 300mg of ropivacaine, and normal saline. In Group A patients, the 150mL was infiltrated after implantation of the prosthesis, prior to insertion of the polyethylene lin

One hundred and forty two consecutive patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty were enrolled. Patients were divided into 2 groups, a periarticular infiltration group (Group A) and an intraarticular injection group (Group B). Both groups received the same infiltrate – a combination of 30mg ketorolac, 500mcg of adrenaline, and 300mg of ropivacaine, and normal saline. In Group A patients, the 150mL was infiltrated after implantation of the prosthesis, prior to insertion of the polyethylene liner. Of this, 50mL was infiltrated into the posterior capsule and intercondylar area; 50mL was infiltrated into the anterior capsule, the collateral ligaments and along the femur and tibia; and the remaining 50mL was infiltrated into subcutaneous tissue following closure of the capsule. Group B patients had all of the 150ml injected intraarticularly after closure of the wound.

Sponsors

Fremantle Hospital
Lead SponsorHospital

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomised trial
Intervention model
Other
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

adult patients waitlisted for primary total knee replacement for osteoarthritis.

Exclusion criteria

allergy or intolerance to study drugs, known inability to receive spinal anaesthesia, and planned bilateral knee surgery. secondary exclusion criteria: history of regular opioid use, concurrent psychiatric illness, serious medical comorbidities that might prolong hospital admission, and coagulation disorders

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026