Skip to content

Efficacy of a transdiagnostic treatment for excessive worry in youth: A randomised trial of brief Behavioural Activation

Efficacy of a transdiagnostic treatment for excessive worry in youth: A randomised trial of brief Behavioural Activation

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12615000433505
Enrollment
34
Registered
2015-05-06
Start date
2015-06-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Around 25% of adolescents report excessive and uncontrollable worry and many adult high worriers report that their excessive worry began in late adolescence (Kerts &Woodruff-Borden, 2011). Younger adults (16-29 years of age) report a higher frequency of worry than older adults about school or work, finances and social interactions (Goncalves & Byrne, 2012). Worry functions as a cognitive avoidance response, suppressing images and somatic activation and preventing the individual from emotional processing of fear that is important for successful habituation and extinction (Stapinski, Abbott, & Rapee, 2010). Such avoidance brings initial relief but results in anxiety maintenance. Worry is an essential feature of Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD) and is a presenting characteristic across all anxiety disorders and depressive disorders (Starcevic, et al., 2007). Thus, worry presents an ideal target for transdiagnostic treatment that targets the common features across anxiety and depression. To target worry as a transdiagnostic process, Chen et al. (2013) developed and evaluated a transdiagnostic approach targeting avoidance strategies in adult worriers by using Behavioural Activation treatment. Behavioural Activation (BA) was originally developed to address avoidance in depression (Addis & Martell, 2004) and its efficacy has been shown in a number of randomised controlled trials. When applied to worry, BA is expected to break down patterns of anxious avoidance through repeated exposure to goal orientated behaviours. Viewing worry as a form of avoidance, BA encourages clients to identify avoidance patterns and increase alternate behaviours in the face of worry-provoking situations (Chen, et al., 2013). Compared to more complex treatment packages, two key advantages of BA are: 1) it is simpler to deliver (Hopko, et al., 2003); and 2) it is efficacious, even when delivered by mental health professionals with minimal training (Ekers, et al., 2011). This simplicity is especially appealing for treating young people as some researchers have criticised that the “extreme comprehensiveness” of the CBT protocol is a primary problem for youth and recommended a low-intensity intervention (Hollon, Garber, & Shelton, 2005). The effect of BAW on anxiety and depression has been demonstrated in our pilot trial (Chen et al., 2013) within a community sample of adults. Findings revealed that participants who received an 8-week group based BAW showed significantly greater reduction in worry, depression and characteristics such as cognitive avoidance, intolerance of uncertainty and problem-solving orientation than the waitlist. Twice as many individuals showed clinically significant reductions in excessive worry after BAW compared to the waitlist. These results provide promising support for BAW as a practical transdiagnostic treatment for worry. Hence the current project aims to investigate the efficacy of BAW in young people. Recent developments in cognitive models of worry and treatments for youth are mostly based on adult research (Vasey, 1993) and studies have demonstrated the applicability of the cognitive model or processes in adults to youth (Laugesen, Dugas, & Bukowski, 2003). However, differences in cognitive, social, and emotional development between adolescents and adults must be taken into account (Vasey, 1993). The present project will examine whether BAW is superior to a waitlist control condition in improving worry in anxious and depressed youths after an 8-week treatment/waitlist and a 3-month follow-up. We will also compare the effect of BAW vs. waitlist on a series of secondary outcomes (i.e., distress, behavioural activation, intolerance of uncertainty, life impairment).

Interventions

Behavioural Activation The core goals of Behavioural Activation for worry (BAW) are to help participants identify avoidant patterns and activate competing behaviours. The treatment includes 8 weekly group sessions, with each session including 6 participants and lasting for 90 minutes. Session 1: Psycho-education on functional impact of excessive and uncontrollable worry and the Behavioural Activation treatment model. Introducing self-monitoring through a Daily Activity Record as homework for

Behavioural Activation The core goals of Behavioural Activation for worry (BAW) are to help participants identify avoidant patterns and activate competing behaviours. The treatment includes 8 weekly group sessions, with each session including 6 participants and lasting for 90 minutes. Session 1: Psycho-education on functional impact of excessive and uncontrollable worry and the Behavioural Activation treatment model. Introducing self-monitoring through a Daily Activity Record as homework for the following week. Session 2: Undertaking functional assessment of the Daily Activity Record to create awareness of avoidant patterns related to worry and its consequences. Identifying participants’ short term and life goals which, together with the functional assessments of their avoidance patterns to help them develop alternative goal oriented behaviours. Sessions 3-7: Encouraging participants to activate competing behaviours in accordance with their goals, to observe the results of their coping strategies, and to evaluate their own progress. Teaching self-administered rewards are on a weekly basis for participants’ incremental behavioural change. During this process, emphasising that the aim is to start working on important tasks, increase activation and disrupt avoidance. Activity scheduling is incorporated in the form of weekly homework activities. From Session 6-8: Emphasising the importance of repetition and integrating change into daily routine. Encouraging participants to link the short-term goals set in Session 2 with long-term life goals and develop a hierarchy of steps based on selected activities towards achieving long-term goals. Session 8: Reviewing the previous sessions and discussing relapse prevention strategies. All the treatment sessions will be conducted by a Provisional Psychologist as the principal therapist, and a Clinical masters student as the co-therapist. The co-therapist will monitor the attendance at each group session.

Sponsors

Dr Junwen Chen
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
14 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Our inclusion criteria are age (14-18 years); greater than or equal to 20.8 raw scores on the PSWQ-C (Chorpita et al., 1997), 28 raw depression scores and 20 anxiety scores on the DASS-21 (Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995) as well as a goal to address worry.

Exclusion criteria

Participants will be excluded if they report current treatment for worry related issues, active suicidal ideation, psychosis, or alcohol and drug dependency, according to the M.I.N.I. diagnostic interview. Antidepressant medication is not an exclusion criterion if participants agree to stay on constant dosage for at least two months prior to involvement and willing to keep medication status stable until the end of the follow-up (3 months).

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026