Skip to content

The Effects of Regular Peak Flow Meter Utilisation on Asthma Self-Management

A crossover before-and-after randomised controlled-intervention pilot study, instigated by pharmacists, investigating whether regular peak flow meter utilisation with appropriate education can improve asthma control and engagement in asthma self-management in a Darwin population with previously diagnosed Asthma.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12615000109505
Enrollment
15
Registered
2015-02-06
Start date
2013-06-22
Completion date
2013-08-24
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Hypothesis: Adults with asthma using a peak flow meter regularly will improve their involvement in asthma self-management and their confidence in managing asthma. Primary objective: Evaluate whether peak flow meter introduction with appropriate education can improve participants’ engagement and confidence in managing their own asthma symptoms. Secondary objectives: - To review peak expiratory flow results - To assess influence of peak flow meter utilisation on asthma control. - To assess if peak flow meter utilisation aids in recognising breathing difficulties earlier.

Interventions

This project aims to explore the prospect of a pharmacist-instigated asthma self-management intervention; whether the introduction of a Peak Flow Meter with appropriate education can improve asthma control and engagement in asthma self-management. The study was designed as a parallel before-and-after randomised controlled-intervention pilot study, conducted in four separate steps. Step 1: The first meeting involved a guided survey (part 1: to gather the subjects’ baseline information) as well

This project aims to explore the prospect of a pharmacist-instigated asthma self-management intervention; whether the introduction of a Peak Flow Meter with appropriate education can improve asthma control and engagement in asthma self-management. The study was designed as a parallel before-and-after randomised controlled-intervention pilot study, conducted in four separate steps. Step 1: The first meeting involved a guided survey (part 1: to gather the subjects’ baseline information) as well as two validated questionnaires (part 2: to assess the subject’s asthma knowledge and asthma control, and all participants were provided with asthma education. Step 2: The second meeting involved the completion of the second survey by all participants (only part 2). Participants allocated into the interventional group were provided with a peak flow meter, a diary to record their measurements, and education on how to use the device. The participants were encouraged to measure their peak expiratory flow every morning and whenever they feel that they may be experience airflow limitation. The participants allocated into the control group were not given any information about the PFM, however both groups’ asthma management was reviewed. Step 3: At the third meeting all participants were asked to complete a third survey (only part 2). Participants in the control group were now provided with a PFM, a diary to record PEF measurements, and education on how to use the device (as per intervention group in Step 2). In a follow-up, all participants were asked to complete a fourth survey (only part 2). The meetings took place at a time and location convenient to the participant and researcher at 4-week intervals (+/-1 week), which took approximately 30 minutes per meeting. Asthma education provided in the first meeting acted as a longitudinal control in order to exclude any improvement of asthma self-management due to asthma education during the introduction of the peak flow meter. Information about asthma and peak flow meter use was obtained through standardised material provided by the Asthma Foundation, the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia, evidence based researched information (e.g. journal articles, Asthma Management Handbook), and education delivered during the university course Bachelor of Pharmacy at Charles Darwin University. Information provided included an explanation of asthma symptoms, aetiology and pathophysiology, relevant information about medications (e.g. relievers, preventers and symptom controllers) and asthma devices (including information about inhaler techniques and maintenance, benefits of certain devices, etc.). Further information was given about the perception of asthma symptoms, triggers, instructions on how to manage an asthma attack, and when to consult a doctor. Asthma management information comprised the treatment goals and self-management information on medication storage, breathing exercises, regular doctor reviews, AAP use, lifestyle modifications, exercise as well as diet and other medication that may influence asthma control. Further information was provided if requested such as on exercise-induced asthma, asthma-related diet and other considerations. The information was provided in accordance to individual’s treatment and needs. In addition, the subject inhaler technique was assessed, any questions were answered and written educational information was offered.

Sponsors

Charles Darwin University
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Educational / counselling / training
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subjects must be 18 years old or over. 2. Subjects must be previously diagnosed with asthma by a doctor. 3. Subjects must be able to provide written informed consent. 4. Subjects must be able to understand information given and able to complete the survey.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subjects using a peak flow meter for their asthma self-management prior to the intervention. 2. Subjects unable to understand and comprehend the information provided. 3. Subjects unable to comply with the meeting requirements of this study. 4. Subjects refusing to participate in the study.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026