Skip to content

Patient satisfaction with their pain management: The effect of provision of pain management advice

Emergency department provision of pain advice compared to standard care: effects on patient satisfaction

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12615000097549
Enrollment
411
Registered
2015-02-04
Start date
2015-03-04
Completion date
2015-05-29
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Many variables impact upon a patient's satisfaction with the way their pain is managed in the Emergency Department (ED). These include the length of time before they receive analgesia, the nature of the analgesia, ancillary means of managing pain (e.g. ice packs), staff courtesy etc. In three studies, we have observed that a high level of patient satisfaction with their pain management is associated with the provision of ‘pain advice’ i.e. being told by the ED staff that ‘pain management is important and that the patient should tell the staff if they have pain’. Providing pain advice (as above) should be part of the routine management of patients with pain. However, this does not always happen and standard care may be sup-optimal. In this study, we will randomize patients into two groups: 1) standard care, 2) standard care plus provision of pain advice (as above). We hypothesize that the provision of pain advice will result in increased patient satisfaction measured ~48 hours after discharge from the ED. If demonstrated, this will be powerful evidence that will inform the development of best-practice pain management guidelines. This is a low risk study. All patients will receive at least standard care. The intervention arm will receive a component of care that should be provided as part of standard care but is often not provided.

Interventions

In one arm (control arm), patients will receive standard care. In the second arm, patients will receive standard care and will be told, by emergency department staff or the investigators, that 'pain management is important and that the patient should tell the staff if they have pain'.

Sponsors

Austin Hospital
Lead SponsorHospital

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Presentation to the emergency department for treatment Age 18 years or more Moderate or severe pain (triage pain score of at least 4)

Exclusion criteria

Refusal to participate (by patient at follow up) Triage category 1 (logistically difficult to obtain pain scores) Significant illness/pain rendering pain scoring inappropriate Inability to communicate a pain score (significant disability, severe illness, poor English) Inability to follow up the patient (e.g. no telephone)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026