Skip to content

Can relative motion extension splinting provide an earlier return to hand function than a controlled active motion protocol after extensor tendon repair in zone V and VI? A prospective randomised clinical trial

A randomized clinical trial comparing early active motion programs: Earlier hand function, TAM, and orthotic satisfaction with a relative motion extension program for zones V and VI extensor tendon repairs

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12615000043538
Acronym
RMES vs Ext CAM
Enrollment
42
Registered
2015-01-21
Start date
2015-02-16
Completion date
2016-02-19
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Patients who have undergone surgical repair of lacerated extensor tendons on the dorsum of the hand at Counties Manukau District Health Board (CMDHB) are rehabilitated with an early mobilisation protocol known as ‘extensor CAM (Controlled Active Motion)’. An audit of CMDHB patients showed similar joint range of motion outcomes to those reported by other centres using comparable protocols following extensor tendon repair. However, reports from centres where an alternative early mobilisation protocol, Relative Motion Extension Splinting (RMES), has been used show patients returning to work earlier. These reports (Hirth et al., 2011; Howell, Merritt, & Robinson, 2005) suggest that patients rehabilitated with the RMES protocol have an earlier ability to use their hand functionally. To date there are no reports of prospective trials comparing the RMES to other early mobilisation protocols. This study will prospectively compare outcomes of patients managed with an extensor CAM protocol to those managed with an RMES protocol; with the hypothesis that those in the RMES group will demonstrate an earlier return to hand function.

Interventions

Patients who have undergone extensor tendon repair in zone V and/or VI will be randomised post-operatively into either a group who receive the usual rehabilitation protocol of controlled active motion, or an experimental group who will be treated using a relative motion extension splinting protocol- this uses an alternative splint and exercise programme. The splint in the intervention group includes only the MCP joints rather than the MCPs, wrist and forearm, and positions the injured MCP joint

Patients who have undergone extensor tendon repair in zone V and/or VI will be randomised post-operatively into either a group who receive the usual rehabilitation protocol of controlled active motion, or an experimental group who will be treated using a relative motion extension splinting protocol- this uses an alternative splint and exercise programme. The splint in the intervention group includes only the MCP joints rather than the MCPs, wrist and forearm, and positions the injured MCP joint (s) in 15-20 degrees relative extension to the other digits. In the first 4 weeks no specific exercises are provided, the patient is advised to move the hand and use it for light activities in the splint. From 4 weeks the patient will be provided with customised exercises to reduce a lag if one exists, such as active MCP extension and place and hold in extension, and tendon gliding exercises if there is a limitation in flexion. These are usually around 10 repetitions 5 times per day but will be adapted to the patient. From 8 weeks passive flexion stretches 5 times per day may be included if necessary to regain flexion. Patients will also be advised on the use of heat and massage at home The hand therapist (OT or physio) will teach the exercises and advise the patient on the use of the hand at home; they may use modalities such as heat and massage in therapy sessions. Consultation will be one-on-one sessions. Usually the first session will be for 1 hour and subsequent sessions 30 minutes each, 1 -2 times per week for the first 4-6 weeks and then once every 1-2 weeks after this until approximately 8 -10 weeks post-operatively. Frequency and duration of sessions will be customised to the individual patients needs and are not dictated by the study protocol. Adherence to splinting will be assessed by the therapist treating the participant and a splinting questionnaire will be completed at the 4 week mark.

Sponsors

Shirley Collocott
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients undergoing extensor tendon repair to at least one digit in zone V and/or VI through CMDHB Simple tendon lacerations of 50-100% of the tendon substance as assessed intra-operatively by surgeon Participants must be able to attend follow-up Participants must be able to understand English or have an interpreter available

Exclusion criteria

Complex injuries involving unstable fractures or concurrent flexor tendon injury Extensor tendon repairs to three or more digits ‘Fight bites’ or infected injuries which cannot be primarily repaired Thumb extensor tendon repairs Any factor which would make the patient unsuitable for inclusion in the view of the treating surgeon or investigator such as a tenuous tendon repair or concerns over patients’ ability to adhere to protocol .

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026