None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
The effect of training on the reliability of a satiety panel has not previously been reported. The aim was to compare the effect of a training intervention in the correct use of a satiety labeled magnitude scale versus no-training on the test-retest precision and reliability of 2 hr post-prandial satiety evaluation after consumption of a standard breakfast.The training exercise will enable the selection a panel to evaluate differences in the satiety of different fibres. The primary aim of this study is to investigate if training satiety panelists in the interpretation and use of the satiety line-scale could improve the test-retest precision and reliability of satiety response to a standard breakfast meal using a parallel intervention of either (i) training or (ii) no-training. A secondary aim is to compare the postprandial glycaemia and satiety effect of a breakfast meal containing viscous fibre PGX or two non-viscous dietary fibres, inulin and wheat dextrin using the trained satiety panel from arm 1.
Interventions
Arm 1 1. effect of a training intervention versus no-training on the test-retest precision and reliability of 2 hr post-prandial satiety evaluation after consumption of a standard breakfast. Standard breakfast (total weight 228g) containing cereal flakes (15g each of Kellogg’s 'registered trademark' Branflakes 'registered trademark' , Cornflakes 'registered trademark' and Special K 'registered trademark' , sultanas (8g) and whole milk (175g) with an energy content of 1261 kJ Panelists will be instructed to fast overnight for 10 hours and consume only water prior to consumption of the standard breakfast. Panelists then complete the labeled magnitude satiety scale. Panelists are tested on 4 occasions with a 3 to 7 day washout. All breakfast bowls are checked to ensure the entire meal was consumed. During the training intervention fasted panelists will consume the standard breakfast meal at time point 0 and complete the LMS. All LMS results will then be transcribed on a whiteboard and the results discussed. Through discussion consensus will be reached by the panelists on the meaning of the descriptor words and an agreed set of more detailed definitions of the descriptors will be generated by the panel through a process of voting. The training session will occur once during the study, seven days before the 4 test occasions and will be for 1 hour. It will be administered by a primary researcher using a pre-defined scripted protocol. Arm 2 2. The trained panelist from arm 1 will complete arm 2. Panelists will fast for 10 hours. A standard breakfast meal with 5g of viscous fibre PGX (A) will be consumed in random order with the control consumed 5g of inulin (B). Panelists will mark their fasting level of hunger/fullness on the labeled magnitude satiety scale (LMS) over a 2 hour period. Panelists will arrive for breakfast at 8am and must consume the meal in 12 minutes. Panelists will be tested on 8 occasions (the controls of inulin and wheat dextrin will be tested twice, PGX granules will be tested twice and PGX gels tested twice) with a 3 to 7 day washout. Blood sample taken at the 7 time points over 2 hours will be used to determine if a relationship with the satiety rating at the same points exists
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Healthy adults aged 19-53 years. BMI 18.1 - 29.5 kg/m^2
Exclusion criteria
The exclusion criteria were: smokers; pregnant women; individuals taking medication known to affect satiety; individuals with food allergies; excessive alcohol consumers and; any history of diabetes, gastrointestinal or cardiovascular diseases. Not previously participated in a satiety panel for Arm 1.