Skip to content

A randomised controlled trial evaluating the impact of the Supported Transfer & Accelerated Rehabilitation Team (START) for Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) clients and how this compares to the usual ACC pathway of care for people over 65 years of age who have sustained an injury. The trial outcomes will focus on on hospital length of stay, subsequent hospitalisations, and cost for patients being discharged from hospital in the Waikato region who have recently sustained an injury.

Evaluating the impact of The Supported Transfer & Accelerated Rehabilitation Team (START) with ACC (Accident Corporation Compensation) participants with regard to hospital length of stay, patient rehabilitation costs and functional rehabiliation outcomes for people over the age of 65 years.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12614000761662
Acronym
START
Enrollment
472
Registered
2014-07-17
Start date
2013-12-02
Completion date
2015-06-02
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The study will seek to explore whether the START service reduces hospital length of stay, readmissions and Home and Community Care Service provision (ACC funded Home Care) amongst ACC clients. Further, the study will determine whether ACC clients referred to START will attract reduced costs for ACC. More specifically, the research aims to address the following questions: 1. In what way does START impact on injury related hospital length of stay and readmissions over one year in comparison to usual care control group? 2. What impact does START have on ACC related costs in comparison to the usual care control group? 3. What impact does START have on the functional capacity and health related quality of life of participants undergoing START in relation to usual care control? 4. What are the perceptions of clients receiving START in comparison to usual care control? 5. What participant sub-groups benefit maximally from START?

Interventions

In 2010 Waikato DHB commenced a pilot supported discharge service (Supported Transfer and Accelerated Rehabilitation Team, or START). A randomised controlled trial was carried out and completed, which compared this service to usual care in terms of client satisfaction, rehabilitation outcomes, hospital length of stay, subsequent hospitalisations, entry to residential care and cost. This trial did not include Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) clients. This current study focusses on recruit

In 2010 Waikato DHB commenced a pilot supported discharge service (Supported Transfer and Accelerated Rehabilitation Team, or START). A randomised controlled trial was carried out and completed, which compared this service to usual care in terms of client satisfaction, rehabilitation outcomes, hospital length of stay, subsequent hospitalisations, entry to residential care and cost. This trial did not include Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) clients. This current study focusses on recruitment of ACC clients using a Randomised Control Trial methodology to investigate the benefits and costs of long-term funding of early supported discharge services for our clients and the usual care ACC pathway for people over the age of 65years. The service provides the following: 1. Facilitate timely and coordinated discharge home for medically stable adults who require ongoing support at home 2. Provide an immediate or rapid response to older people presenting in the emergency department who could be discharged directly home if appropriate home support services were established on discharge. The START team consists of Health Care Assistants (HCA) trained to Level III on the NZQA framework, Registered Nurses working at an advanced level of practice and Allied health (Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy). In addition, Consultant Geriatricians provide weekly input through case conferencing. Within the START intervention, the initial visit to the client following discharge will involve the RN and HCA completing the following with the patient: 1. Assessment of need and determination of goals for the patient 2. Development of service plan to support goal attainment 3. Determination of the number of visits required to deliver the service plan Health Care Assistants will provide up to four visits a day, seven days a week and will utilise functional rehabilitation principles to maximise recovery through incorporating exercises within ADL tasks. For instance, progressively increasing walking distance, sit to stands, lying in bed to standing, carrying groceries home from shops and putting away in cupboards. The model focuses on maximising independence rather than fostering dependence and aligns with developing research in New Zealand and significantly, such exercise programmes can be successfully implemented by non-health professionals rather than Physiotherapists. Such a staffing compliment within START will maximise patient recovery and responsiveness and reduce fragmentation. There will be a minimum of weekly reviews / reassessment of the patient by RN and OT/ PT with changes made as required to the service plan. Once patients have returned home, direct clinical care responsibility returns to the General Practitioner (GP). The team will work in close collaboration with GPs and Practice Nurses as well as the specialist community teams and hospital services. The team will work with Patients until their return to independence or until stable but requiring continuing input from community nursing or home care support. Patients will be likely limited to six weeks maximum attendance, though the team on an exception basis may choose to extend this to maximise potential recovery. Patients will be supported to develop meaningful distal goals, which will be interpreted into a therapy ladder to support development of a care plan utilising functional rehabilitation principles.

Sponsors

The University of Auckland
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
65 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

The eligibility criterion for inclusion into this study are as follows: (1) The client has been accepted OR is pending decision by ACC for the provision of services following an accident; (2) The client is over 65 years (or close in age and interest) and lives within the START catchment area; (3) The client does not require acute hospital based treatment; (4) The client consents to being treated at home by the team, is aware of and is in agreement with the objectives set by the referring inter-disciplinary team; (5) Following assessment, the client is considered to have potential for partial or complete recovery with suitable home rehabilitation within six weeks; (6) The client is able to stand and transfer with one person (with or without the help of a resident carer); (8) The client's home is judged to be safe for the client in addition to the visiting staff and; (9) The client has had a recent injury and is at a borderline level of function with an associated reduction in personal (PADL) and / or extended (EADL) activities of daily living and who without input from the team is: (i) likely to fail to recuperate full potential of functional recovery; and (ii) or is likely to fail to manage satisfactorily at home despite conventional community support and therefore would be at risk of hospital re-admission or institutionalisation; AND the client consents to participate in the trial. The client eligibility for ACC START is the same whether the client is being referred for the rapid response or supported discharge. The point of difference is in the location of the client at the point of referral and therefore the process following referral, namely ED versus ward. Specifically, the rapid response component prevents admission through providing an immediate responsive and coordinated service delivered to clients in their own home where as the supported discharge reduces length of hospital stay.

Exclusion criteria

1. The person place of discharge is not directly to their own home. 2. The person is younger than 65 years. 3. The person is declined by ACC 4. The person does not fit the inclusion criteria stated above

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026