Skip to content

Oxford Unicompartment Knee replacement versus total knee replacement: a randomised controlled trial

Functional outcomes of arthroplasty for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomised controlled trial of Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12614000734662
Enrollment
100
Registered
2014-07-11
Start date
2016-02-15
Completion date
2018-12-30
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Arthritis of the inner part of the knee is common. The most commonly used surgical treatment for this condition is total knee joint replacement. This is effective, however a knee replacement is inferior in function to the non-arthritic knee. An alternative to total knee replacement is replacement of the inner part of the knee only, thus preserving the non-arthritic parts of the knee (termed a unicompartmental replacement). Possible advantages of this include more normal motion and feeling of the knee after surgery. Possible disadvantages include durability inferior to total knee replacement. There have been few good studies comparing the 2 alternatives. This study aims to compare patient satisfaction and durability of unicompartmental knee replacement and total knee replacement.

Interventions

Uncemented Oxford Medial Unicompartmental knee replacement involves replacement of the arthritic medial compartment of the knee with an uncemented metal tray on the medial tibial plateau, an uncemented metal replacement of the medial femoral condylar articular cartilage, and a layer of mobile polyethylene inserted between the 2 components. The duration of the operation will vary, but will be in the vicinity of 60 minutes.

Sponsors

Jonathan Manson
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee, intact ACL, preservation of full thickness lateral compartment cartilage on valgus stress XR, correctable intra-articular varus, flexion deformity less than 15 degrees.

Exclusion criteria

Inflammatory arthritis, ACL deficiency, MCL deficiency, lateral compartment OA, bone on bone lateral patellofemoral OA + lateral patellar subluxation

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026