Skip to content

Comparison between the stripping technique and the combined excisional/ablative technique for the treatment of bilateral ovarian endometriomas: a multicentric, randomized study

Patients with bilateral endometriomas underwent laparoscopy cystectomy by two different surgical techniques (stripping vs combined technique), using patients themselves as their own controls, to evaluate ovarian reserve as primary outcome.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12614000653662
Enrollment
50
Registered
2014-06-23
Start date
2013-01-01
Completion date
2014-04-30
Last updated
2024-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The primary purpose of the study is to compare laparoscopic excision of endometrioma by stripping technique versus combined technique (stripping plus coagulation/ablation) in terms of ovarian reserve and recurrence of endometrioma

Interventions

Each patient with bilateral endometriomas underwent to a single laparoscopy to remove the cysts. In the same laparoscopy two different techniques were performed: excisional stripping technique on one side versus combined technique (partial stripping and bipolar coagulation on last part on hilus) on the other side. Each patient received both surgical techniques performed at either side after random assignment. The mean duration of surgery was comparable between the two techniques and it was appr

Each patient with bilateral endometriomas underwent to a single laparoscopy to remove the cysts. In the same laparoscopy two different techniques were performed: excisional stripping technique on one side versus combined technique (partial stripping and bipolar coagulation on last part on hilus) on the other side. Each patient received both surgical techniques performed at either side after random assignment. The mean duration of surgery was comparable between the two techniques and it was approximately 20 minutes. Duration of study: one year.

Sponsors

"Sapienza" University of Rome
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 38 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

-bilateral ovarian endometriomas larger than 3cm -pelvic pain -infertility

Exclusion criteria

-previous ovarian surgery -medical treatment (GnRH analogs or oral contraceptives) in previous 3 months or during follow-up

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026