Skip to content

Effects of interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels on food purchases: a randomised controlled trial

Effects of Traffic-Light and Health Star Rating front-of-pack nutrition labels, compared to standard Nutrition Information Panel label, on the mean nutrient profiling score of food purchases among the adult shoppers in New Zealand: a three-arm open-label parallel randomised controlled trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12614000644662
Acronym
Starlight
Enrollment
1357
Registered
2014-06-18
Start date
2014-10-07
Completion date
2015-12-19
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Governments throughout the world are considering implementing front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition labelling systems. FOP labels provide ‘at a glance’ information that is easy for consumers to understand and act upon. There is now substantial global evidence indicating that interpretative FOP labels (using graphics, symbols or colours) are better understood than traditional quantitative nutrition labels (Campos et al., 2011). However, research on the impact of FOP labels on food purchases and consumption is greatly needed (Signal et al., 2012). The aim of this study is to assess the effects of two interpretive FOP nutrition labels, compared with a standard non-interpretive numerical label, on the healthiness of consumer food purchases in supermarkets and other retail outlets in New Zealand. In this study, two types of FOP labels (Traffic Lights (TL) and Health Star Rating) are compared with a nutrition information panel, which is a current mandatory labelling standard in New Zealand. Several studies suggest that the TL is the best understood FOP label (Signal et al., 2012; Hawley et al., 2013). Health Star Rating labelling will be introduced as a voluntary FOP labelling in Australia. Because it is impossible to apply the front-of-pack labels to be tested to actual food products in supermarkets and other stores, all labels to be tested in the trial will be delivered via download of a smartphone application. The application will be active during the 4 weeks of the study intervention only. The application will be used in the following way: (1) Participants open the application on their smartphone; (2) They position the smartphone camera over the barcode of a packaged food product; (3) The camera acquires the barcode image and immediately provides the product’s nutrition information in one of the following onscreen label formats: Traffic Light Label, Health Star Rating Label or Nutrition Information Panel.

Interventions

Arm 1: Traffic-Light front-of-pack nutrition label. Traffic-light label uses green, amber and red colours to indicate the relative levels (low, medium and high) of four nutrients (fat, saturated fat, sugar and sodium). Arm 2: Health Star Rating front-of-pack nutrition label. The label assigns a rating from 0.5 (less healthy) to 5 (most healthy) stars to foods basing on their Health Star Rating score, calculated from energy, fat, sugar and salt content, and adjusted for other components, such as

Arm 1: Traffic-Light front-of-pack nutrition label. Traffic-light label uses green, amber and red colours to indicate the relative levels (low, medium and high) of four nutrients (fat, saturated fat, sugar and sodium). Arm 2: Health Star Rating front-of-pack nutrition label. The label assigns a rating from 0.5 (less healthy) to 5 (most healthy) stars to foods basing on their Health Star Rating score, calculated from energy, fat, sugar and salt content, and adjusted for other components, such as fruit and vegetables. Intervention details (for Arm 1 & 2): Mode of administration: delivered via a specially designed smartphone application (app) Duration of intervention: four weeks Frequency: participants will be able to use the smartphone app to view nutrition labels as often as they wish. To view a nutrition label, users scan barcodes of packaged food products using the smartphone camera, and assigned labels instantly appear on the phone screen. Strategies to improve adherence: Automated reminder messages via the smartphone app will appear three times per week to prompt the participants to use the app.

Sponsors

National Institue for Health Innovation; University of Auckland
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Prevention
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1) Adults (n=1500), 18 years and older, currently living in NZ 2) Owners of a compatible smartphone (iPhone version 3 or later, or Android; models compatible with the application) 3) Shop at a supermarket at least once a week 4) Regular main shopper for the household (do at least 50% of shopping for the household every week) 5) Available for a continuous 5-week trial period 6) Ability to read and understand English 7) Ethnicity will be monitored to ensure equal recruitment of Maori, Pacific and Other ethnicities

Exclusion criteria

1) Previously used the “FoodSwitch” application and/or have it downloaded on their phone 2) Planning to travel/be away for a prolonged time (more than 2 consecutive days) during the study intervention – those participants will be invited to join the study once they are back 3) Only one person per household may be enrolled in this study 4) Failure to successfully complete run-in phase

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026