Skip to content

Analgesic efficacy of combined celiac and splanchnic nerve blocks in upper gastrointestinal tumours; A preliminary study

Effect of neurolytic celiac block or splanchnic block versus combined splanchnic and celiac blocks with 70% alcohol in patients with upper gastrointestinal tumours on analgesic requirements, postprocedural pain and quality of life

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12614000410651
Enrollment
60
Registered
2014-04-15
Start date
2014-05-05
Completion date
2016-01-03
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

To our knowledge yet no studies compared the efficacy of combined splanchnic nerve blockade and coeliac plexus blockade in pain relief and quality of life due to upper gastro-intestinal (GIT) tumours. The aim of this study was to compare effect for combined block including (splanchnic and celiac ) on quality of analgesia and quality of life versus each technique separately.

Interventions

Group III: for whom splanchnic using (10 ml of 70% alcohol preceded by 2 ml of 2% lidocaine will be injected in each needle, two needles will be used) and celiac blocks (with 20 ml of 70% alcohol preceded by 2.5 ml of 2% lidocaine will be injected in each needle, two needles will be used or 40 ml of alcohol in single needle approach )after failure of pain control with strong opioid medications and then, analgesic requirements will be managed according to severity of pain and WHO analgesic

Group III: for whom splanchnic using (10 ml of 70% alcohol preceded by 2 ml of 2% lidocaine will be injected in each needle, two needles will be used) and celiac blocks (with 20 ml of 70% alcohol preceded by 2.5 ml of 2% lidocaine will be injected in each needle, two needles will be used or 40 ml of alcohol in single needle approach )after failure of pain control with strong opioid medications and then, analgesic requirements will be managed according to severity of pain and WHO analgesic ladder.. The intervention wil be performed once for each patient. Follow up will be extended along patients’ survival.

Sponsors

Mohamed Y. Makharita
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients suffer from visceral pain originating from in-operable abdominal cancer (originated from the upper abdominal viscera, from the stomach to the proximal transverse colon) reporting VAS equal to or greater than 7 after failure of strong opioids analgesics (3rd step of WHO analgesic ladder

Exclusion criteria

Patients have INR >1.5 or platelet count <50,000,infection at the site of needle entry, persistent hypotension, ascites or whom receive previous neurolytic block or have psychiatric illness or whom declines to participate will be excluded from the study.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026