Skip to content

The moderating influence of attentional bias on the efficacy of distraction vs mindfulness in an experimental pain task

The moderating influence of attentional bias on the efficacy of distraction vs mindfulness in an experimental pain task

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12614000385640
Acronym
Nil
Enrollment
125
Registered
2014-04-09
Start date
2014-05-05
Completion date
2014-08-31
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

This study aims to examine the moderating impact of baseline attentional bias on the relative efficacy of two brief interventions: mindfulness vs distraction. Participants will have their attention biases towards painful stimuli assessed and will then be randomized to receive either distraction or mindfulness before completing two experimental pain tasks.

Interventions

Brief Mindfulness: A 10-15 minute mindfulness exercise will be delivered in a laboratory setting. The exercise will teach undergraduate students to focus on mindfulness of breath and body scanning. Hence, they will learn to focus on internal sensations non-judgementally immediately before completing two acute experimental pain tasks. Two water tanks manufactured by Thermoline Scientific Australia were used to conduct the cold pressor task. Each tank was comprised of a 20L circulating water bat

Brief Mindfulness: A 10-15 minute mindfulness exercise will be delivered in a laboratory setting. The exercise will teach undergraduate students to focus on mindfulness of breath and body scanning. Hence, they will learn to focus on internal sensations non-judgementally immediately before completing two acute experimental pain tasks. Two water tanks manufactured by Thermoline Scientific Australia were used to conduct the cold pressor task. Each tank was comprised of a 20L circulating water bath chamber (model TLWB-30), immersion cooler (TIC-400) and a heat circulator (TU-3). In order to ensure participants initial arm temperature was controlled for, they were firstly asked to submerge their arm up to the elbow for 30 seconds in the warm tank, with a maintained temperature of 37degrees C ( plus or minus 0.5). Following this, they submerged the same arm up to the elbow into the tank of cold water, maintained at 5 degrees C(plus or minus 0.5). Research in the past indicates the cold pressor task produces the “Lewis Effect”, whereby pain is produced by vasodilation of the blood vessels due to warm water, quickly followed by vasoconstriction due to cold water. A series of shocks a 0.5, 1.5 and 3.0 microamps will be administered and a pain rating will be recorded.

Sponsors

The University of Sydney
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Undergraduate psychology student

Exclusion criteria

Cardiac problems History of chronic pain Current pain on a visual analogue scale of greater than 3 out of 10 (i.e. > 3/10)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026