Skip to content

A Prospective Randomized Trial of the Direct Anterior Approach versus the Posterior Approach in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

A randomized trial comparing the anterior and posterior approaches in hip replacement surgery for patients having unilateral hip arthritis using a series of questionnaires to measure pre and post operative outcomes and differences.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12614000131651
Enrollment
73
Registered
2014-02-04
Start date
2014-02-18
Completion date
2015-01-13
Last updated
2020-02-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The research is aimed at investigating and comparing two surgical techniques practised for hip replacement surgery. The standard approach used across many health institutions is the posterior approach. This study compares the outcomes between the posterior and the anterior approach. The anterior approach is a well established technique that is widely used in Europe and the USA. There is reportedly a reduced rate of dislocation and quicker recovery time. However it is a technique that requires a higher level of skill and specialized equipment. The study aims to determine if the anterior approach for hip replacement surgery is equal if not better when compared to the standard posterior approach. Participants will be randomly allotted into one of two groups. One group will have surgery via the anterior approach and the other via the posterior approach. Participants will only know which group they are allotted to post operatively.

Interventions

Participants will be randomized into two groups to undergo hip replacement surgery via the anterior or posterior approach. Surgery will be performed by 2 senior orthopaedic surgeons at a single institution. Participants will be assessed pre and post-operatively up to 3 months post operatively using a series of questionnaires. The anterior approach used utilizes a modified varient of the Hueter anterior approach. This surgery is expected to take between 1-2 hours to peform depending on complexi

Participants will be randomized into two groups to undergo hip replacement surgery via the anterior or posterior approach. Surgery will be performed by 2 senior orthopaedic surgeons at a single institution. Participants will be assessed pre and post-operatively up to 3 months post operatively using a series of questionnaires. The anterior approach used utilizes a modified varient of the Hueter anterior approach. This surgery is expected to take between 1-2 hours to peform depending on complexity. The incision is made 2cm posterior and 1cm distal to the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and extended in a straight line distally and slightly posterior ending approximately 2cm anterior to the greater trochanter (GT) The interval between Sartorius and tensor fascia lata (TFL) is palpated and then incised. The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve is identified and protected. TFL is then retracted laterally while Sartorius is retracted medially. The interval is then further developed through the interval between rectus femoris and gluteus medius until the lateral hip capsule can be palpated. Iliopsoas and rectus femoris are gently elevated and retracted medially to complete the exposure of the hip capsule. The lateral circumflex vessels are then identified and ligated. Capsulotomy is then performed and the edges tagged, reflected and protected to allow for subsequent reconstruction. The femoral neck is then cut and femoral head delivered. The femur is now externally rotated approximately 45 degrees to facilitate acetabular exposure Precautions are taken during external rotation to prevent fractures. Preparation of the acetabulum can now occur. The anterior musculature is retracted carefully to minimize soft tissue damage. Labral excision is completed and the inferior capsule band incised to facilitate liner placement. Reaming is done under direct vision and acetabular component trialling is done under radiographic guidance. On completion of acetabular preparation, the femur is externally rotated to 90 degrees and the hip adducted and hyperextended. If there is inadequate exposure of the femur, release of obturator internus with piriformis can be performed. Once exposure is adequate, the femur is then breached with a box cut and broached. Broaching is undertaken carefully to prevent proximal femur fractures, cortical perforation and excessive anteversion. Broaching is completed when the size matches that of the preoperative template. This is guided by feel and depth. The femoral components are then trialled guided by the pre-operative template and final broach size. The hip reduced with internal rotation. Leg length, offset and stability are checked clinically and with the aid of the image intensifier. On meeting the parameters, the hip is then dislocated, trial components removed, prosthesis inserted and hip reduced. The capsular incision is now repaired. Haemostasis with diathermy or ligation is achieved prior to closure of the soft tissue and skin.

Sponsors

Eastern Health Orthopaedic Unit
Lead SponsorHospital

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
40 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Symptomatic unilateral hip arthritis ASA 2-3

Exclusion criteria

Symptomatic bilateral hip arthritis ASA>3

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026