Skip to content

Outcomes from standard treatment for incontinence in elderly women in residential care

Conservative treatment for incontinence in elderly women in rest homes: a cost efficacy study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12614000087651
Enrollment
70
Registered
2014-01-23
Start date
2012-06-11
Completion date
2013-06-10
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Efficacy of conservative treatments for incontinence in an elderly group of women dwelling in rest homes, and the costs involved in achieving any benefit. Outcome measures include the severity of leakage, and the effect on quality of life.

Interventions

Intervention:Conservative treatment tailored by the Continence Advisor to each individual. Recording of a bladder diary, of pad usage and volume leaked. The intervention includes pelvic floor muscle training, bladder re-training, life style interventions like increased physical activity, attention to fluid intake type and volume, and diet suggestions, performed by the individual and supervised daily by the carer , and by the Advisor every 2-4 weeks. Treatment was for 12 weeks for each individua

Intervention:Conservative treatment tailored by the Continence Advisor to each individual. Recording of a bladder diary, of pad usage and volume leaked. The intervention includes pelvic floor muscle training, bladder re-training, life style interventions like increased physical activity, attention to fluid intake type and volume, and diet suggestions, performed by the individual and supervised daily by the carer , and by the Advisor every 2-4 weeks. Treatment was for 12 weeks for each individual and hopefully advice continued via the carer indefinitely. At the end of the 12 weeks further tests were run and costs measured.The study lasted for a year as the dates of recruitment was staggered. Costs of the intervention were recorded for a cost efficacy analysis

Sponsors

Canterbury District Health Board
Lead SponsorHospital

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomised trial
Intervention model
Single group
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
0 to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Female Urinary and/or bowel incontinence requiring at least one pad/day Reasonable cognitive function and ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Significant cognitive impairment. Residents were all residents of rest homes and were elderly, but age was not an inclusion/exclusion criterion

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026