Skip to content

Evaluation of short term support for emergency department attendees who present with moderate and high levels of stress: a pilot study

A randomised controlled trial of a psychosocial brief intervention of motivational interviewing with emergency department attendees with mild and moderate levels of stress

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12614000031662
Enrollment
90
Registered
2014-01-10
Start date
2015-02-12
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Mental health (MH) problems are a major public health concern. Because the prevalence of MH issues is higher in the Emergency Department (ED) than the general population norm, the ED is a potentially effective (but neglected) setting to target these issues. Detection of mental health problems before they become severe will enable intervention and support to be provided at an early stage, which may improve health and prevent further deterioration. The proposed study focuses primarily on participants with mild and moderate levels of psychological distress as identified by the Kessler Psychological Distress Scales and will exclude those with severe levels of psychological distress as this may indicate an existing mental disorder. The primary hypothesis to be tested is that, compared to patients who receive standard care i.e. no BI, patients who receive early BI (MI and MI follow-up) will report: 1) reduced levels of depression, anxiety and stress; 2) higher levels of motivation to self-manage health needs; 3) increased (appropriate) healthcare-seeking behaviours; and 4) improved quality of life.

Interventions

The detection of health problems before they become severe will enable intervention and support to be provided at an early stage. The Brief Intervention (BI), based on Motivational Interviewing (MI) principles, will be designed to encourage and motivate study participants to seek and obtain further assistance for their psychological needs which may improve health and prevent further deterioration. The MI intervention is designed to be pragmatic in that the MI will be necessarily tailored to each

The detection of health problems before they become severe will enable intervention and support to be provided at an early stage. The Brief Intervention (BI), based on Motivational Interviewing (MI) principles, will be designed to encourage and motivate study participants to seek and obtain further assistance for their psychological needs which may improve health and prevent further deterioration. The MI intervention is designed to be pragmatic in that the MI will be necessarily tailored to each participant’s individual circumstances. Following recruitment, all participants will be provided with 'standard care' (i.e. usual care from their ED admittance). Those participants who have been randomised into the intervention group, the BI will be delivered by telephone interview 48-96 hours after the participant’s ED attendance, with a ‘booster’ MI of three telephone calls during the two week period following the initial BI. The initial MI and the three subsequent MIs are each expected to be 60 minutes in length. (approx 4 hours total for each study participant) Follow up of all participants will occur at one, three, six and twelve months by telephone contact. Pre and post-intervention measures will be used to assess mental health and well-being, subjective quality of life (SQOL); and intervention based outcomes including motivation and confidence, healthcare-seeking behaviour and appropriate health service utilisation. Motivational interviewing (MI) is client-centred, directed therapy, which prepares individuals to become more receptive to change by exploring dissonance in the perceived benefits and costs of behaviours. Its central principal is that motivation to change should be elicited from people, not somehow imposed on them. MI is non-confrontational, assumes equity in the client counselor relationship, emphasises the client’s right to define their own problems and to choose how to deal with them. The counselor uses empathetic listening to minimise resistance and increase motivation for change. Motivation is viewed as a state of readiness to change which fluctuates and can be influenced by others. The stages of change model have proved useful for the understanding and conduct of a motivational interviewing session. MI is particularly useful for working with clients who are ambivalent, resistant or reluctant to change. All change is preceded by some degree of ambivalence. When using an interview technique these components are applied by: exploration of the person’s thoughts about the issue e.g. feeling depressed or stressed; use of reflective listening; showing respect and willingness to understand; giving relevant and accurate health information and providing explanations; helping to clarify personal goals or role in the community; avoiding argument; and helping people to look at their behaviour and how it impacts on others.

Sponsors

The Prince Charles Hospital
Lead SponsorHospital

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Prevention
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Consenting adults, 18 years and over, who are alert and orientated and able to speak English. Those emergency department attendees, who have mild/moderate levels of psychological distress identified by the Kessler Physiological Distress Scales because there is a strong association between very high K10 scores and a current Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) diagnosis of anxiety and affective disorders, and a lesser but still significant association the K10 and other mental health categories, or the presence of any current mental disorder; and do not require hospital admission, will be eligible

Exclusion criteria

Those with 'severe' K10 scores; those unable or unwilling to give consent; people with a cognitive impairment/learning disability; those admitted to hospital as in-patients; those already in mental health programs; those unable or unwilling to be contacted by telephone; or those in police custody.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026