Skip to content

A Novel Approach to Real-life Communication: Narrative Intervention in Aphasia

For people with aphasia following stroke, is a manualised narrative intervention programme aimed at improving discourse in everyday communication situations more effective than usual speech pathology intervention as measured by improved language ability across the different levels of language (i.e. words, sentences, discourse) in everyday communication activities?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12613001263785
Acronym
NARNIA
Enrollment
14
Registered
2013-11-18
Start date
2013-04-01
Completion date
2013-10-01
Last updated
2020-02-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

This project is a randomized control trial that will deliver and evaluate a highly innovative intervention for people with aphasia (i.e. loss of or reduction in the ability to use language) following stroke. Pilot work with the intervention, based around narrative structure and daily communication activities, has been successful in significantly improving language ability in everyday communication. The study will recruit 20 people with aphasia from Royal Perth Hospital and compare the novel protocol to usual speech pathology intervention. Outcomes will significantly refine future intervention with people with aphasia and facilitate translation of theory into routine clinical practice.

Interventions

This study compares two groups of clients with aphasia, one receiving a novel speech pathology intervention and the other receiving usual speech pathology care. Participants in both groups will receive 20 sessions of intervention (400 treatment sessions in total). Sessions (approx. 1 hour duration) will be offered 4 x per week over a 5 week period. This is commensurate with length of stay at the local sites and realistic for community based intervention. A total of 200 therapy sessions will the

This study compares two groups of clients with aphasia, one receiving a novel speech pathology intervention and the other receiving usual speech pathology care. Participants in both groups will receive 20 sessions of intervention (400 treatment sessions in total). Sessions (approx. 1 hour duration) will be offered 4 x per week over a 5 week period. This is commensurate with length of stay at the local sites and realistic for community based intervention. A total of 200 therapy sessions will therefore be provided to the 10 participants in the experimental group, and 200 sessions to the control group (by the usual speech pathologist). For the experimental group, the intervention protocol will be developed following principles set out in Whitworth (2010), using a metalinguistic approach to increase awareness of both sentence and narrative structure. Beginning with narratives using picture sequences, the therapy will focus initially on identifying the main event/s in each picture, accessing the verb and the relevant nouns for each event, followed by creating a complete argument structure around each. A framework for narrative discourse, based on story grammar, will be introduced, and sentences organized around setting the scene (the beginning), the events taking place (the middle), and concluding the story (the end). More naturalistic situations will be introduced using a mind-mapping approach where diagrams are then used to retrieve and then link ideas, events, and words in a way that leads to the organization and planning of thoughts for subsequent production.

Sponsors

Royal Perth Hospital
Lead SponsorHospital

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Participants will be recruited who (a) are medically stable (b) present with their first episode of aphasia (c) are undergoing rehabilitation (d) have no cognitive difficulties such as dementia (d) are able to give informed consent to participate and (e) were proficient in English prior to their stroke (i.e. used English in everyday communication). There is no restriction on type of aphasia. Mild dysarthria and/or apraxia of speech may be present but should not be the primary difficulty.

Exclusion criteria

Evidence of (a) severe aphasia, including severe anomia, severe apraxia or dysarthria (b) cognitive difficulties such as dementia (c) inability to give informed consent to participate and (d) do not use English in everyday communication.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026