Skip to content

Comparisons of mercury-free and automated sphygmomanometers with mercury sphygmomanometry in hypertensive and normotensive pregnant women: parallel, prospective, observational study

Comparison of the accuracy of mercury-free and automated sphygmomanometers with mercury sphygmomanometry in hypertensive and normotensive pregnant women

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12613001262796
Enrollment
340
Registered
2013-11-18
Start date
2010-02-17
Completion date
2012-03-21
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Our aim was to find a suitable replacement for mercury sphygmomanometry to measure blood pressure in pregnancy. A mercury-free sphygmomanometer and an automated oscillometric device were compared with mercury sphygmomanometry in 170 hypertensive and 170 normotensive pregnant women. The mercury-free sphygmomanometer appears to be the more accurate and an acceptable replacement for mercury in pregnancy.

Interventions

Blood pressure was measured in hypertensive and normotensive pregnant women comparing an automated blood pressure measuring device and a mercury-free sphygmomanometer with a mercury sphygmomanometer as the gold standard. Both of the test devices use a standard blood pressure cuff, but have different ways of determining the blood pressure. The automated device inflates and measures blood pressure electronically, while the non-mercury device uses a manual bulb to inflate and deflate the cuff, simi

Blood pressure was measured in hypertensive and normotensive pregnant women comparing an automated blood pressure measuring device and a mercury-free sphygmomanometer with a mercury sphygmomanometer as the gold standard. Both of the test devices use a standard blood pressure cuff, but have different ways of determining the blood pressure. The automated device inflates and measures blood pressure electronically, while the non-mercury device uses a manual bulb to inflate and deflate the cuff, similar to mercury sphygmomanometry. Pregnant women were allocated on a non-random basis to either having the automated device vs mercury or the mercury-free device vs mercury. Each women then had nine blood pressures taken, alternating between mercury and the test device over a 20 minute period.

Sponsors

Prof Mark Brown
Lead SponsorIndividual

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Hypertensive and normotensive pregnant women in their third trimester

Exclusion criteria

None

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026