None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
Our aim was to find a suitable replacement for mercury sphygmomanometry to measure blood pressure in pregnancy. A mercury-free sphygmomanometer and an automated oscillometric device were compared with mercury sphygmomanometry in 170 hypertensive and 170 normotensive pregnant women. The mercury-free sphygmomanometer appears to be the more accurate and an acceptable replacement for mercury in pregnancy.
Interventions
Blood pressure was measured in hypertensive and normotensive pregnant women comparing an automated blood pressure measuring device and a mercury-free sphygmomanometer with a mercury sphygmomanometer as the gold standard. Both of the test devices use a standard blood pressure cuff, but have different ways of determining the blood pressure. The automated device inflates and measures blood pressure electronically, while the non-mercury device uses a manual bulb to inflate and deflate the cuff, similar to mercury sphygmomanometry. Pregnant women were allocated on a non-random basis to either having the automated device vs mercury or the mercury-free device vs mercury. Each women then had nine blood pressures taken, alternating between mercury and the test device over a 20 minute period.
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Hypertensive and normotensive pregnant women in their third trimester
Exclusion criteria
None