Skip to content

To measure the effectiveness of Emergency nurse practitioners on service and quality of patient care outcomes for patients in the Emergency department compared with standard emergency medical care.

A randomised controlled trial to measure the effectiveness of emergency nurse practitioners on service and quality of patient care outcomes compared with standard emergency medical care in adult patients presenting to the Emergency department and allocated to the fast treatment zone.

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12613000933752
Acronym
None
Enrollment
260
Registered
2013-08-23
Start date
2014-02-01
Completion date
2014-03-15
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The aims of this research are to compare the effectiveness of Emergency Nurse Practitioner (E-NP) on service and quality of patient care outcomes, with that of standard care in the Emergency Department (ED). Hence the following null hypotheses will be tested: For patients presenting to the ED with pain, allocated to the fast track zone and who receive care from either an E-NP or standard care, there will be no difference in: Primary outcomes 1. Pain score reduction and time to analgesia Secondary outcomes 2. Service indicators of a) Waiting time b) Number of patients who did-not-wait c) Length of stay in emergency department d) Representations with 48 hours In addition, a comparative evaluation of clinicians’ use of evidence based guidelines for management of i) knee injury, ii) ankle injury and iii) burns injury will be conducted to further test the integrity of the intervention.

Interventions

For patients presenting to the emergency department with Pain, following collection of baseline data and the eligibility of the patient is confirmed; consenting patents in series will be randomly assigned to either the intervention or the control group by a computer-generated program. The intervention to be evaluated in this research will be emergency nurse practitioner (E-NP) service. The emergency nurse practitioner model of care specifically includes assessment and management of patients usi

For patients presenting to the emergency department with Pain, following collection of baseline data and the eligibility of the patient is confirmed; consenting patents in series will be randomly assigned to either the intervention or the control group by a computer-generated program. The intervention to be evaluated in this research will be emergency nurse practitioner (E-NP) service. The emergency nurse practitioner model of care specifically includes assessment and management of patients using critical decision-making skills, referring directly to other health care providers, prescribing medications, performing interventions, ordering and interpreting diagnostic investigations and admission/discharging autonomy. The E-NP will assess the next available patient within their scope of practice according to time waiting to be seen as per usual ED policy. After this initial assessment the E-NP will commence management of the patient and complete the episode of care. The duration of the intervention will be from initial patient assessment until discharge from the ED. The service is geographically located in the Fast track area of the ED and the E-NP manages patients presenting with ATS categories 2-5 (Australian College of Emergency Medicine, 2012).

Sponsors

Queensland University of Technology
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Age >16 years Patient presentations ATS 2-5 Pain identified in triage description

Exclusion criteria

Non English speaking Neurovascular compromise Multiple injuries ACS including effects of drugs/ Ethanol GCS <14 Fulfils inclusion criteria but requires ED medical management

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026