Skip to content

Identifying and overcoming barriers to nutrition care in hip fracture.

Do hip fracture inpatients, following multidisciplinary and multimodal changes to routine clinical practice guided by a pragmatic, action research framework, when compared with the baseline routine clinical practice of individualised nutritional care, lead to improved inpatient energy and protein intakes?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12613000868785
Enrollment
120
Registered
2013-08-06
Start date
2011-09-06
Completion date
2012-09-03
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

More than one third of hip fracture patients are likely to be malnourished; these patients routinely fail to meet energy and protein intake requirements after surgery. Malnutrition results in poor nutritional, patient and healthcare outcomes. International trials targeting strategies to adequately address these issues are inconsistent and data relevant to the Australian context is lacking. Baseline data on patients admitted for surgical intervention of an acute hip fracture has suggested a number of barriers to nutritional assessment, diagnosis and delivery in this population. This study will aim to define barriers to nutrition care; the treating team will then collaboratively develop and implement changes to usual clinical practice to overcome these. Before and after measurements will be used to evaluate the success of these changes to routine clinical care. A positive outcome may lead to significant improvements in nutritional, patient and healthcare outcomes.

Interventions

An ethics approved before and after study evaluating changes to routine clinical practice for patients admitted to an acute hip fracture inpatients unit for surgical intervention of a hip fracture. Observed and reported barriers to nutritional care were identified; improvements to routine nutritional care were then identified, developed and implemented by the treating team as part of usual service improvement practices using an action research framework. The new multi-disciplinary, multi-modal

An ethics approved before and after study evaluating changes to routine clinical practice for patients admitted to an acute hip fracture inpatients unit for surgical intervention of a hip fracture. Observed and reported barriers to nutritional care were identified; improvements to routine nutritional care were then identified, developed and implemented by the treating team as part of usual service improvement practices using an action research framework. The new multi-disciplinary, multi-modal nutritional model of care was then developed by the multidisciplinary treating team and embedded into routine clinical practice for all patients. Key improvements implemented were adopting a medicalisation of nutrition approach (medical scripting of supplements, supported medical diagnosis of malnutrition and patient education, consideration of whether enteral tube feeding was considered in the patients best interest), a coordinated multidisciplinary approach including delegation of activities to nutrition assistant staff, enhancements to the hospital foodservice system, and multimodal strategies to improve staff and patient knowledge and awareness. These changes were then evaluated using the same measures conducted during the first phase. The duration of assessment of the model of care changes was over two 10 week periods; however the total duration of data collection for the entire multiphase study including identification of barriers to intake was conducted from September 2011-July 2012. Pragmatic outcomes measures were only included that were collected as part of routine clinical practice audit; nil additional measures or interventions apart from those applied as changes to routine clinical practice were undertaken. Strategies used to monitor adherance were not applicable in response to the pragmatic trial design.

Sponsors

Jack Bell
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomised trial
Intervention model
Other
Primary purpose
Prevention
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
0 to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria were patients admitted to an orthogeriatric unit of a publically funded metropolitan hospital with a fractured neck of femur requiring surgical intervention.

Exclusion criteria

nil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026