None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
The primary aim of the study is to determine if implementation of an early identification and intervention protocol for injured workers (who have been assessed as being at high risk for delayed return to work) results in better outcomes compared to usual care (current practice) for similar high risk injured workers. The better outcomes we anticipate are: reduced costs of workers compensation claims and earlier sustained RTW in the 12 month follow-up period.
Interventions
In the Intervention hospitals, those workers found to be at significant risk for a long-term disability (who meet the inclusion criteria) will be offered a specified management protocol. High risk cases will be defined according to their score on the modified Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire – short form (OMPSQ-SF) (greater than or equal to 50/100). The OMPSQ-SF is designed to identify known psychosocial risk factors for long-term disability following a musculoskeletal injury. The OMPSQ-SF is to be administered as soon as possible after the worker first reports his/her claim (within 5 working days of the injury). The OMPSQ-SF items will be read out (over the telephone) to each injured worker by a claims manager and that officer will note the score (between 0-10) for each item. But the officer will not determine the total score for a particular case. Instead, this will be completed by the Research Manager (the same day) separately. Subsequently, the Research Manager will notify the Intervention claims manager if a particular case is in the high risk category. The implementation of the protocol will be the responsibility of the RTW coordinator for the identified worker’s hospital once s/he has been advised by the insurance Claims Manager that a case is in the high risk category. The protocol will include the immediate referral to a nominated clinical psychologist for an assessment of the psychosocial obstacles for early recovery and return to work. The RTW coordinator will then contact the nominated treating doctor (NTD) to explain the research project and to seek his/her cooperation and consent for the referral to the nominated clinical psychologist for up to 6 treatment sessions (i.e. 1 hour sessions at least once per week for up to 6 sessions in total). The RTW coordinator will also request the claims manager to refer the injured worker to a nominated independent medical consultant (IMC) for an early specialist review (< 3 weeks). The IMC will provide a report on his/her findings and recommendations to the NTD, RTW coordinator, and the claims manager. It is also expected that the RTW coordinators will be in close (and early) contact with each injured worker’s workplace supervisor to assist the RTW processes (e.g., identify and resolve any workplace-based RTW obstacles as required) as per usual practice. The protocol will also require a review by an independent physiotherapist if any physiotherapy treatments are continuing beyond 6 weeks. The referral for this review will be made by the claims manager within 2-3 weeks of the initial claim. The intervention protocol is expected to run for 8 weeks.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Health workers (from the participating hospitals) who report soft tissue injuries that are substantially due to their work, make a claim for workers compensation, report their injury to their Nominated Treating Doctor (NTD), and take 7 or more days off work due to their injury will be invited to participate in the research project. The injured worker must be able to read and speak English well-enough to not require an interpreter. The injured worker must provide informed consent to participate (based on the requirements of relevant ethics committee) after having the purpose of the study explained to him/her by the claims manager by telephone.
Exclusion criteria
Those with a non-significant injury (i.e., take less than 7 days off work and do not report it to their NTD), a stress claim, or are non-English speaking will be excluded. The presence of a ‘Red Flag condition’ (fractures or neurological damage indicating a need for early surgery) is also an exclusion criterion, as well as being unwilling to participate in the study.