Skip to content

Games based professional learning for primary school teachers for the improvement of teaching quality and student outcomes of physical skills and self-perception during physical education.

In late stage primary school students (10 - 12 years), does a game centered approach professional development intervention, compared to normal practice, improve the quality of teaching and in turn the skills and physical self perception of students?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12613000605796
Acronym
PLUNGE
Enrollment
104
Registered
2013-05-28
Start date
2012-09-01
Completion date
2013-04-18
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to report the effects of a Game Centered Approach professional development program for improving Teaching quality, active learning time, fundamental movement skills, physical self perception and student perceived motivational climate. The Professional Learning for Understanding Games Education (PLUNGE) program was developed to enhance the practical PE teaching skills of primary school teachers using a Game Centered Approach in an authentic teaching environment. We hypothesized that teachers in the PLUNGE intervention, compared to those in the control group, would display higher quality teaching and greater active learning time in classes, with students displaying more favorable changes in fundamental movement skills, physical self-perception and perceived motivational climate over the study period.

Interventions

Teacher professional development intervention focusing on the use of a game centered approach for teaching primary Physical Education. Intervention involves: 1- Teacher professional learning: A 2.5 hour theory based group professional learning seminar covering: i) Physical activity research findings and theoretical grounding for improving students’ skills, ii) Game Centered Approach (GCA) background, iii) GCA comparison to a direct instruction methodology and the connection of a GCA to the ex

Teacher professional development intervention focusing on the use of a game centered approach for teaching primary Physical Education. Intervention involves: 1- Teacher professional learning: A 2.5 hour theory based group professional learning seminar covering: i) Physical activity research findings and theoretical grounding for improving students’ skills, ii) Game Centered Approach (GCA) background, iii) GCA comparison to a direct instruction methodology and the connection of a GCA to the existing NSW PDHPE syllabus, iv) using a constraints led approach to guide a PE lesson, v) the use of questioning to assist student cognition, vi) concepts of quality PE teaching including Active Learning Time (ALT), classroom management for improved ALT and enhanced skills learning, and identification and use of Teachable Moments in PE classes. The professional learning component of the PLUNGE intervention is based on the training model of PD, in which content is delivered to teachers in a passive manner, with controlled, standardized content delivery. 2- Teacher mentoring: Consultation regarding the presentation of researcher developed GCA curriculum across the 6 week delivery phase, and in-class scaffolding and feedback of curriculum delivery for the first 4 weeks of the program. Mentoring ensures the teachers involved understand the format and purpose of the designed lessons, and for teachers to observe, undertake, problem solve and trouble shoot more effective PE practice with an academic partner, in the authentic context of their own scheduled physical education lessons (4 x 1 hour). Mentoring begins the week following the professional learning group seminar (1 week between seminar and mentoring).

Sponsors

University of Newcastle
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Educational / counselling / training
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
10 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Teacher: Generalist primary school teacher Student: Stage 3 (10-12 years age) Healthy participants

Exclusion criteria

Teacher: Undergraduate P.E training Student: Mental development disorder (eg- down syndrome)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026