None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
The aim of this study is to perform a multimodal comparison of 3-month courses of weekly isoniazid and rifapentine (3HR) with 9 months of daily isoniazid (9H) for latent tuberculosis infection, using a variety of indices: a. Cost-benefit b. Patient satisfaction c. Adherence to prescribed therapy
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Males and non-pregnant, non-breastfeeding females Weight > 45kg Willingness to provide signed informed consent. Sufficient English-language skills for informed consent. Clinical indication for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) treatment. 1) Person with a positive interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) (defined as >0.35 IU/mL TB antigen-Nil) AND one of the following: close contact to someone with culture confirmed TB or from a high-risk background, current or planned immunosuppressive therapy, or calcification on chest X-ray and no prior history of TB treatment; 2) IGRA converters defined as a documented change from negative to positive within a two-year period; 3) Persons with any other clinical indication for LTBI treatment including persons with a negative IGRA (eg high risk clinical history and pending immunosuppressive therapy)
Exclusion criteria
Confirmed or suspected active TB disease Contacts to a source case with known resistance to isoniazid and/or rifampicin Persons with a history (by written documentation or self-report) of ever receiving > 1 week of treatment for active or latent TB. History of allergy or intolerance to isoniazid or rifamycins Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 100 IU/L