Skip to content

Increasing Motivation and Self-control to Reduce Alcohol Consumption among Undergraduate Students

An Intervention Using Process and Outcome Mental Simulation Exercises and Self-control Training to Reduce Alcohol Consumption among Undergraduate Students

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12613000573752
Enrollment
70
Registered
2013-05-21
Start date
2013-05-24
Completion date
2015-09-30
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

This experimental study will examine the effectiveness of increasing motivation and self-control to reduce alcohol consumption among undergraduate students..It is proposed that motivation and self-control are two psychological factors that can influence alcohol consumption. Adopting theoretical perspectives from the Pham and Taylor’s (1999) model on mental simulations and the strength model of self-control (Baumeister et al., 1998), people who are motivated via a process mental simulation manipulation and have self-control practice on a Stroop task will be more likely to reduce their alcohol consumption.The aim of this research is to test the hypothesis that individuals who receive motivation and self-control manipulations will have higher reduction in alcohol consumption than a control group comprising individuals that did not receive manipulation. Also, we hypothesise that combined experimental manipulations of motivation and self-control is more effective than either of the motivation and self-control manipulations alone in reducing alcohol consumption

Interventions

Participants are randomly allocated into 4 groups. The trial will involve two independent conditions using a 2 (mental simulation: mental simulation vs. control irrelevant visualization exercise) x 2 (self-control training: difficult training vs. active ‘control’ easy training) design. For the mental simulation intervention, participants randomized to receive the intervention will be required to imagine the steps they will take to change their alcohol consumption known as ‘process mental simulat

Participants are randomly allocated into 4 groups. The trial will involve two independent conditions using a 2 (mental simulation: mental simulation vs. control irrelevant visualization exercise) x 2 (self-control training: difficult training vs. active ‘control’ easy training) design. For the mental simulation intervention, participants randomized to receive the intervention will be required to imagine the steps they will take to change their alcohol consumption known as ‘process mental simulation’ and imagine how they would feel on achieving the outcomes known as 'outcome mental simulation'. Participants will be given a process mental simulation script adapted from Pham and Taylor’s (1999) article. The targeted behaviour is adapted as drinking within recommended safe limits. Participants need to follow instructions, read the script, and rehearse it with eyes closed under quiet conditions. Then, they need to write down their responses in the space provided and remember it throughout the research period. Written responses will be content analysed to check for compliance with the task. This mental simulation task should take no longer than 10 minutes. Participants randomized to the control condition will not receive any relevant visualization exercise but will be asked to imagine a recent visit to the cinema or shopping centre to maintain equivalent information load to the active mental simulation condition for 10 minutes. For the self-control training, participants randomized to receive the difficult intervention will be required to complete a computerised response-inhibition task (incongruent version of the ‘Stroop colour-naming’ task). Participants randomized to receive the ‘control’ easy training condition will receive an easy version of the response inhibition task (congruent version of the ‘Stroop colour-naming’ task. This response-inhibition task should take no longer than 5 minutes. Participants will complete the task to which they have been assigned immediately after the visualization task in the initial session and then repeat this on a daily basis throughout the intervention period of four weeks.The response inhibition task system will be used to monitor participants’ adherence by logging each trial and uploading participant responses to a remote server via internet providing compliance data with the training task. Also, four reminder emails or text messages will be sent to prompt participants to practice the Stroop task. The design is therefore 2 (IV1) x 2 (IV2) design with 4 arms. Arm 1: mental simulation & difficult self-control training incongruent Stroop task; Arm 2: mental simulation & ‘control’ easy self-control training congruent Stroop task (congruent version of Stroop task does not affect response inhibition); Arm 3: irrelevant control visualization task & difficult self-control training incongruent Stroop task; Arm 4: irrelevant control visualization task & ‘control’ easy training congruent Stroop task (active control group).

Sponsors

Ging Ging Wong
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Factorial
Primary purpose
Prevention
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

All participants should be over 18 years old, non-abstinent with respect to alcohol consumption and undergraduate students

Exclusion criteria

non alcohol drinkers

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Mar 17, 2026