Skip to content

Tolerance and Efficacy of Extubation to Nasal Oxygen in women undergoing surgery

A randomised trial investigating the tolerance and efficacy of nasal versus facemask oxygen in patients undergoing surgery requiring intubation, whom are at risk of haemoglobin desaturation.

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12613000404729
Acronym
TEETOTAL
Enrollment
66
Registered
2013-04-12
Start date
2013-04-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

To see the tolerance patients have after a general anaesthetic of nasal oxygen as opposed to facemask oxygen (which is normal). Previous studies show that compliance with oxygen therapy is better with nasal oxygen than facemask oxygen. Also we believe this technique gives patients as effective oxygenation. Therefore potentially improving patient safety.

Interventions

Extubation to nasal prong oxygen at 6L/min versus facemask oxygen at 6 L/min. From extubation until discharge from recovery ward (approximately for 1 hour).

Sponsors

King Edward Memorial Hospital for Women
Lead SponsorHospital

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Prevention
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients undergoing surgery General anaesthesia requiring intubation One of the following: BMI > 30 Regular Smoker Respiratory disease limiting exercise or requiring regular medication

Exclusion criteria

Refusal or withdrawal of consent Ischaemic heart disease Cerebrovascular disease Pregnancy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026