Skip to content

Multi-level Intervention for Suicide Prevention in New Zealand

The effect of multi-level community interventions including training in recognition of suicide risk factors, workshops on mental health issues, community, media and web based interventions, and the distribution of print resources on annual rate per 100, 000 of suicidal behaviour (suicide and intentional self-harm presentations to Emergency Departments) in four District Health Board regions of New Zealand.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12613000399796
Acronym
MISP-NZ
Enrollment
714306
Registered
2013-04-11
Start date
2009-12-01
Completion date
2010-02-01
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

MISP-NZ is a 25 month Multi-level community Intervention for Suicide Prevention designed for implementation in New Zealand (MISP-NZ). Its design and key components are informed by lessons learned from two similar multi-level suicide prevention studies implemented in Japan and Germany but tailored to the New Zealand context. Design: MISP-NZ is a cluster randomised controlled trial involving eight District Health Board (hospital) regions, comprising four demographically matched pairs. One DHB region in each pair will be randomised to receive either the intervention or control (practice as usual). Methods: After conducting a stock-take of existing suicide prevention activities in each region, an intervention package will be designed for implementation in each DHB region. The interventions will include: training in recognition of suicide risk factors; workshops on various mental health issues; community based interventions; media based interventions; and the distribution of print and web-based resources. The key objective of MISP-NZ is to determine whether the MISP-NZ interventions are more effective in reducing rates of suicidal behaviours than current practice. The main outcome is the annual rate per 100,000 of suicidal behaviours (intentional self-harm and self-inflicted deaths) evaluated over the study period. Discussion: The design of MISP-NZ is based on what is known from the public health and health services literature on complex trial methods overseas to create a robust study for the New Zealand setting. This 25 month multi-level intervention trial will be unique in that the interventions will be tailored to the local context and aligned with the goals of the national suicide prevention strategy. A key challenge will lie in the successful completion of a process evaluation which will enable conclusions to be drawn about the effectiveness of the interventions, their implementation and their overall impact on the primary outcome of intentional self-harm. Successful achievement of this will shed considerable insight into the impact of MISP-NZ on intentional self-harm and the potential generalisability of the findings to other countries and contexts.

Interventions

The Multi-level Intervention for Suicide Prevention in New Zealand study (MISP-NZ) involved five levels of intervention, training in suicide prevention, workshops on mental health issues, community interventions, media interventions and the distribution of print based resources. The whole study ran for 31 months with a six month baseline period (1 Dec 2009 to 31 May 2010) and a 25 month intervention period (01 June 2010 to 30 June 2012). Training in recognition of suicide risk factors involved

The Multi-level Intervention for Suicide Prevention in New Zealand study (MISP-NZ) involved five levels of intervention, training in suicide prevention, workshops on mental health issues, community interventions, media interventions and the distribution of print based resources. The whole study ran for 31 months with a six month baseline period (1 Dec 2009 to 31 May 2010) and a 25 month intervention period (01 June 2010 to 30 June 2012). Training in recognition of suicide risk factors involved using a local adaptation of the online Question, Persuade, Refer (QPR) training. This training intervention was distributed to individuals in the community. Workshops on various mental health issues such as depression, alcohol, anxiety, alcohol and drug issues, and self-harm were delivered. The delivery of the workshops varied. In one DHB a MISP established suicide prevention network invited various influential speakers on suicide prevention and mental health-related topics once a month with an attendance of up to 80 people over the study period. MISP intervention staff were sometimes invited to join mental health forums or similar organized by DHB staff and MISP intervention staff would present alongside DHB staff. Most other presentations were delivered solely by trained MISP intervention staff who had a backgrounds of nursing, social work and OT; and had received additional suicide prevention training. Group sizes varied with the sizes of organisations. MISP intervention staff aligned their workshops to organizational needs, hence the session times varied from between 20-30 minutes to 3-4 hour sessions. Presentations were delivered during weekly staff meeting, at yearly training days, at mental health forums, at workplaces and many workshops were specifically organized. Working hours to deliver those workshops ranged from 6 am to 10 pm, with some delivered at weekends. Organisations included businesses, health organisations and the public. MISP intervention staff provided between 0 and 5 workshops week. The average was estimated to be one workshop per week per DHB (approximately 4 workshops a week all DHBs), varying in length as per requirement of the organization, over the 25 months intervention period. Community based interventions included information days and information stalls at family days and festivals. Media based interventions focused on working with local media to support best practice in the reporting of suicide. Distribution of print and web-based resources such as leaflets and poster from national campaigns, and the Mental Health Foundation and related mental health organisations. Print and web-based resources were distributed throughout the 25 months intervention period. Distribution occurred concurrently with the delivery of workshop, preliminary engagement and follow up. To monitor the implementaiotn of the intervnetions, weekly teleconferences, regular clinical supervision of intervention staff and quarterly face to face meetings ensured that interventions in each DHB aligned between DHBs whilst adhering to the purpose of the study. Follow-up QPR workshops were delivered monthly for six months in order to debrief participants on their training outcome and if and how they had used their QPR skills. Decreasing numbers of workshop participants led to the de-establishment of these QPR sessions and an increased focus on the distribution and delivery of suicide prevention workshops.

Sponsors

University of Otago, Wellington
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Prevention
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
0 to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

All residents in each intervention DHB area.

Exclusion criteria

Nil.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026