Skip to content

Comparing the use of a needle guidance device with free-hand technique in performing ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks: a prospective randomized trial.

In adult patients undergoing bilateral ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, does the use of a needle guidance device compared to a free-hand technique when performing the TAP block increase needle tip visibility and reduce procedural time?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12613000392763
Enrollment
20
Registered
2013-04-10
Start date
2013-04-23
Completion date
2013-09-18
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

This study is designed to determine whether the use of the CIVCO (Registered Trademark) ultrasound needle guide (Infiniti, CIVCO Medical Solutions, Kalona, Iowa, USA) will improve visualisation of the needle tip during ultrasound-guided TAP blocks when compared with the “free hand” technique for patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Furthermore, we aim to study whether it will shorten the procedural time, improve operator satisfaction or lead to increased dermatomal blockade.

Interventions

This is a crossover study, where participants are randomly assigned to two groups. Group 1 participants will receive the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block via the needle guided technique and then followed by free hand technique whilst Group 2 participants will receive the TAP block via free hand technique and then followed by needle guided technique. The intervention is the use of an ultrasound needle guide (Infiniti, CIVCO Medical Solutions, Kalona, Iowa, USA) when performing an ultrasou

This is a crossover study, where participants are randomly assigned to two groups. Group 1 participants will receive the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block via the needle guided technique and then followed by free hand technique whilst Group 2 participants will receive the TAP block via free hand technique and then followed by needle guided technique. The intervention is the use of an ultrasound needle guide (Infiniti, CIVCO Medical Solutions, Kalona, Iowa, USA) when performing an ultrasound-guided TAP block. The ultrasound needle guide consists of two parts, a reusable bracket that is placed beneath the probe cover, and disposable needle guides that attach to the brackets. The needle is passed through the attached needle guide, which holds the needle in the plane of the ultrasound probe. The TAP block will be performed with a 21-gauge 100 mm Stimuplex needle and 200 mg of ropivacaine for patients more than or equal to 70 kg (20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine each side) or 150 mg of ropivacaine for patients less than 70 kg (20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine each side). The ultrasound probe will be placed in a transverse plane to the lateral abdominal wall in the midaxillary line, between the lower costal margin and iliac crest. The needle will then be introduced in-plane of the ultrasound probe and advanced until the tip reaches the plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. At this point 20 ml of ropivacaine solution will be injected in 5 ml aliquots after negative aspiration. The transversus abdominis plane will be visualized expanding with the injection. The intervention will be completed within 5-10 minutes. The duration of the wash-out period is 5 minutes.

Sponsors

Royal Melbourne Hospital
Lead SponsorHospital

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Crossover
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Patients must be aged 18 years or over, must be undergoing open abdominal surgery, and are scheduled for bilateral, single shot, ultrasound guided in-plane TAP blocks administered during general anaesthesia at the completion of surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Patients who are unable (due to an intellectual disability, cognitive deficit or language barrier) or unwilling to consent, who have a contraindication to undergoing TAP blocks (coagulopathy, local skin infection, allergy to ropivacaine or planned administration of large volume local anaesthetic by another route [e.g. epidural]) or who will not be available for assessment postoperatively (i.e. ventilated patients) will be excluded.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026