Skip to content

The relationship between limb length discrepancy and Foot Posture Index (FPI).

The relationship between limb length discrepancy (LLD) and Foot Posture Index (FPI) in ambulatory subjects aged 18-65 years with an LLD of five millimetres or greater as diagnosed by the researchers

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12613000379718
Enrollment
18
Registered
2013-04-09
Start date
2013-04-15
Completion date
2013-10-31
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The study aims to evaluate the effect of an LLD (Limb length discrepancy) using a modern measure of foot position; the Foot Posture Index (FPI).

Interventions

This study aims to evaluate the effects of an Limb Length Discrepancy on foot posture as measured by the Foot Posture Index (FPI). To measure a participant’s limb length discrepancy, a tape measure method (TMM) will be used. This method involves measuring the distance from the centre of the anterior-superior iliac spine (ASIS) to the centre of medial malleolus of the participant by use of a ruled tape. This is done with the patient’s leg externally rotated so that the lateral border of the foot

This study aims to evaluate the effects of an Limb Length Discrepancy on foot posture as measured by the Foot Posture Index (FPI). To measure a participant’s limb length discrepancy, a tape measure method (TMM) will be used. This method involves measuring the distance from the centre of the anterior-superior iliac spine (ASIS) to the centre of medial malleolus of the participant by use of a ruled tape. This is done with the patient’s leg externally rotated so that the lateral border of the foot lies as close to the horizontal as is comfortable. The patient will be measured in supine and sitting position in order to standardise the method. Measurement from the ASIS is a semi-intrusive measurement, requiring participants to lift their shirt so that the ASIS may be palpated; however this is a routine measure which is widely used in clinical practice. When performed by trained professionals, measurement by the TMM should cause minimal patient alarm or discomfort. The FPI is measured with the subject standing. An FPI is performed by measuring six scoring criteria and giving a score of -2 to +2 on a 5 item scale (where positive scores represent more pronated characteristics).The six clinical criteria used in scoring an FPI are: talar head palpation, supra and infra lateral malleolar curvature, calcaneal frontal plane position, talonavicular joint prominence, congruence of the medial longitudinal arch, and abduction/adduction of the forefoot compared to the rearfoot. The six scores are summed, with high positive values indicating a significantly pronated foot; high negative a supinated one and values close to zero showing a foot near neutral position. The measurements are estimted to take 15 minutes . Participants are each examined on one occasion only.

Sponsors

University of WA
Lead SponsorUniversity

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Have an Limb Length Discrepancy (LLD) of five millimetres or greater as diagnosed by the researchers. Be between 18-65 years old. Must be ambulatory.

Exclusion criteria

If there is difficulty palpating the participant’s anatomical landmarks (Anterior Superior Iliac Spine (ASIS), and medial malleolus). Inclusion of such patients would lead to an increase in the measurement error for patients with impalpable landmarks, and would lead decreased result validity. If the patient admits to a past history of lower-limb non-cosmetic surgery

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026