Skip to content

Cervical radiculopathy: A new traction method versus ventroflexion traction :A randomized controlled 1-year follow-up study

the efficacy of two different traction methods in addition to conventional treatment on nerve root function, pain, and disability in patients with discogenic cervical radiculopathy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12613000169741
Enrollment
216
Registered
2013-02-12
Start date
2010-03-01
Completion date
2012-07-01
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the nerve root function, pain, and disability in patients with discogenic cervical radiculopathy after two different multimodal programs in both the short- and long-term; One of them involves manual therapy, exercise and the traditional ventroflexion traction in which an angle of 24 degree of flexion is considered as an optimal traction angle . The another one involves manual therapy, exercise and new method of traction in which we identify the optimal traction angle based on the maximum recovery of the peak to peak amplitude of flexor carpi radilais H- reflex .in this study ,we hypothesized that the addition of new method of traction to a multimodal program will yield a significant additional benefit to pain, function or disability in patients with cervical radiculopathy.

Interventions

The other two groups (A&B) received conventional treatment in addition to intermittent mechanical cervical traction; the group (A) received the traditional ventroflexion tractionfor 20 minutes, three times per week for four weeks. During the ventroflexion traction the patient was lying supine on a softly padded table with a pillow under the knees for relaxation. The position of the head during traction was adjusted by using a goniometer at 24 degree flexion without rotation or side flexion. the

The other two groups (A&B) received conventional treatment in addition to intermittent mechanical cervical traction; the group (A) received the traditional ventroflexion tractionfor 20 minutes, three times per week for four weeks. During the ventroflexion traction the patient was lying supine on a softly padded table with a pillow under the knees for relaxation. The position of the head during traction was adjusted by using a goniometer at 24 degree flexion without rotation or side flexion. the traction force was started at 9.1 kg (20 Ib) or 10% of the patient's body weight (whichever was less) and increased approximately 0.91 to 2.27 kg (2-5 Ib) every visit, depending on centralization or reduction of symptoms. The maximum force used was 15.91 kg (35 Ib). The on/off cycle was set at 50/10. The group (B), which received the flexor carpi radialis H- reflex based traction method for 20 minutes, three times per week for four weeks, followed the same procedures of traditional traction with only exception that the optimal head posture was selected according to findings of H reflex. flexor carpi radialis H- reflex amplitude was recorded after the patient maintained the end range of 24 degree head flexion, mid position, 15 degree backward extension and 5 degree backward extension for 20 minutes. The electrophysiological findings represented in peak to peak amplitudes were compared with the findings recorded during comfortable neutral positions. The idea behind this technique is that postural modification can cause amplitude inhibition, indicating more compression of the impinged nerve root, or recovery, indicating decompression of the root. The peak to peak amplitudes was selected as compression –decompression indicator as it is a more sensitive predictor of normal physiologic changes than is latency, which need more long time to be changed .

Sponsors

Ibrahim Moustafa Moustafa
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
35 Years to 48 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients were included if they had unilateral C6 or C7 radiculopathy following herniated disc confirmed by imaging (computed tomography [CT] and/or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), C6 or C7 dermatomal numbness, and duration of symptoms more than 3 months to avoid acute stage of inflammation. Further, Inclusion criteria for these patients included a test item cluster identified by Wainner et al, which included the presence of 4 positive examination findings (Spurling test, upper limb tension test, cervical distraction test, and less than 60° cervical rotation towards the symptomatic side

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria included the presence of any medical "red flags" (eg, tumor, fracture, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, prolonged steroid use), History of previous cervical or thoracic spine surgery , Signs or symptoms of upper motor neuron disease, vestibulobasilar insufficiency, osteoporosis, , amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and inability to tolerate cervical flexion or extension position

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026