Skip to content

A study to compare the effect of three burns dressings on burns in children

The effect of three different burns dressings on time to re-epithelialisation of partial thickness burns in children: a randomised control trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12613000105741
Enrollment
103
Registered
2013-01-25
Start date
2013-03-18
Completion date
2014-01-12
Last updated
2022-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

At the Royal Children's Hospital in Brisbane the standard of care in burns dressings for small to medium partial thickness burns has changed over the years. Currently, silver containing dressings are used to prevent infection and promote healing. However despite the large number of burns dressings available on the market, very few high level trials have been conducted in children or adults. This study aims to determine the effect of various silver and silicone containing burns dressings for the treatment of partial thickness burns in children. The study hypothesises that: 1. Rate of healing, need for grafting and subsequent scarring from a burn wound is partly determined by the choice of dressing used. 2. The choice of dressings used can partly assist with pain and anxiety strategies during dressing change procedures; and impacts on a child's comfort and engagement in activities. 3. The dressing which best fulfils the above qualities will also be the most cost effective.

Interventions

A comparison of three dressings currently being used. Group 1: Burn wound will be dressed with Acticoat (a silver containing dressing without a silicone skin interface). Participants will have their dressing changed twice weekly until the wound re-epithelialises or grafting is required; Group 2: Burn wound will be dressed with Acticoat and Mepitel (a silicone coated nylon grid dressing) Participants will have their dressing changed twice weekly until the wound re-epithelialises or grafting occur

A comparison of three dressings currently being used. Group 1: Burn wound will be dressed with Acticoat (a silver containing dressing without a silicone skin interface). Participants will have their dressing changed twice weekly until the wound re-epithelialises or grafting is required; Group 2: Burn wound will be dressed with Acticoat and Mepitel (a silicone coated nylon grid dressing) Participants will have their dressing changed twice weekly until the wound re-epithelialises or grafting occurs; Group 3: Burn wound will be dressed with Mepilex Ag (soft foam, silver containing dressing with safe-tac technology). Participants will have their dressing changed twice weekly until the wound re-epithelialises or grafting occurs.

Sponsors

The University of Queensland
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
1 No limit to 15 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Children with acute superficial partial to deep partial thickness burn injuries <10% TBSA (total body surface area), presenting to Royal Children's Hospital, Brisbane within 72hours of injury.

Exclusion criteria

Superficial and full thickness burns Burns >10% TBSA Known sensitivity to silver Chemical and friction burns Non-English speaking Cognitive impairment

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Mar 22, 2026