Skip to content

Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block versus caudal block for pain relief in children

Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block versus caudal block for postoperative pain control in children undergoing groin surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12612001074886
Enrollment
80
Registered
2012-10-08
Start date
2012-10-09
Completion date
2013-03-05
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Caudal block (CB) is the gold standard technique for analgesia in children undergoing surgical interventions in the groin. Although the efficacy and the safety of this technique is high, nonetheless, there are several caveats such as unwarranted motor blockade of the lower limbs and disturbances of the bladder function, potentially resulting in delayed demission in the ambulatory setting. An alternative method to block neural structures which innervate lower abdominal wall has been described: the transverse abdominal plane block. The ultrasound guided technique improves the safety of margin. However, although this new technique seems to offer substantial advantages so far only experience from small case series are available. In particular, the TAP block has not been compared in a systematic trial with the "gold standard", the caudal block. The aim of this study is to evaluate potential differences in the effectiveness of postoperative analgesia and to test the hypotheses that the duration of pain relieve is prolonged after a TAP block when compared with an epidural caudal technique.

Interventions

Anesthesia will be induced with sevoflurane and followed by placement of a laryngeal mask airway. Then a single Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block will be administered with levobupivacaine 0.25% 0.4mL/kg

Sponsors

Yusheng Yao
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male
Age
2 Years to 5 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

ASA ststus I-II aged 2-5yr undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia repair

Exclusion criteria

Hypersensitivity to any local anesthetics Infections at puncture sites Bleeding diathesis Preexisting neurological disease

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026