None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
This trial will compare the sedative medicine dexmedetomidine and propofol with propofol. The comparison will take place in a group of patients undergoing ERCP without intubations. Although TCI systems decrease the risk of respiratory during sedation with propofol in the patients undergoing ERCP, the risk persists. Propofol has some side effects including reduced breathing efforts, which sometimes requires the anaesthetist to intervene and support the airway or even convert the sedation to a general anesthesia with intubations. Dexmedetomidine as a newer sedative medicine, appears to have fewer of these effects and reduce the total amount of propofol. Patients will be randomized to receive either propofol or dexmedetomidine combined with propofol. They will receive their normal general anesthesia without intubations. The researchers will be measuring: the target concentration of propofol in maintain anesthesia and the total amount of propofol during the surgery; need for airway support; and haemodynamic values intraoperatively.
Interventions
The intervention will be usage of dexmedetomidine combined with propofol for sedation during ERCP. Dosages of dexmedetomidine is introduction with a loading dose of 1.0 micrograms per kilogram in ten minutes (eg. 60micrograms for an 60kg patient). While propofol is typically used via a "target-controlled-infusion" pump with an initial target concentration set at 4ug/ml (target concentration ranging between 1 and 4ug/ml). The two drugs would be given via intravenous infusion, commencing once the patient is positioned and it would not be combined with other sedative agents.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Adults without intubations undergoing ERCP
Exclusion criteria
Any contraindication to sedation.