Skip to content

Replacing missing lower back teeth with an implant-supported removable partial denture.

Management of Kennedy Class 1 mandibular situations with a removable partial denture retained by a resilient retainer system supported by short implants; Objective and Subjective Measures.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12612000893808
Enrollment
17
Registered
2012-08-22
Start date
2015-01-01
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The puropse of this study is to compare two treatment options for the replacement of missing lower back teeth; one option is the standard treatment using a removal partial denture, and the other option is use of a removable partial denture held in place by dental implants (a dental implant is an artificial tooth root, surgically placed into the jaw bone, to hold a tooth or denture in place). The hypothesis is that the implant-supported option provides significant benefits over the conventional removable partial denture in terms of function (ability to chew and break-down food), comfort, and overall patient satisfaction.

Interventions

Two treatment options will be compared (the trial will be designed as a within-subject cross-over trial, hence each subject will experience both interventions): a) use of a conventional removable partial denture. This will involve standard clinical practice in designing and constructing a removable partial denture. In general, it will involve approximately 4 clinical appointments, each lasting between 30-60 minutes each. The appointments will generally be about 1 week apart, depending on how qui

Two treatment options will be compared (the trial will be designed as a within-subject cross-over trial, hence each subject will experience both interventions): a) use of a conventional removable partial denture. This will involve standard clinical practice in designing and constructing a removable partial denture. In general, it will involve approximately 4 clinical appointments, each lasting between 30-60 minutes each. The appointments will generally be about 1 week apart, depending on how quickly the dental laboratory can prepare and return the required denture work. The denture will be tooth retained. After a 3 month adaptation period, a range of simple clinical tests and questionnaires will be used to assess the denture performance (approximately 2 hour appointment). b) use of a removable partial denture retained and supported by dental implants. This will involve the surgical placement of two short and narrow implants per patient, conducted under local anaesthetic. The surgical appointment will take approximately 2 hours. Following healing (minimum of 6 weeks), the removable partial denture will be modified to incorporate the resilient retainer system (approximately 2 hour appointment), hence the denture will be both tooth and implant retained (after a 3 month adaptation period, a range of simple clinical tests and questionnaires will be used to assess the denture performance (approximately 2 hour appointment). . There will be a minimal-to-no wash-out period between the two treatment options. The dentures will be modified such that the patient will experience the alternate treatment option. The aim will be for one operator to conduct all treatments, hence minimising the potential for operator inconsistencies.

Sponsors

The University of Melbourne - Melbourne Dental School
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Crossover
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Kennedy class 1 pattern of missing teeth in the lower jaw

Exclusion criteria

Unhealthy patients not able to safely undergoe elective dental surgery, patients with active dental disease, history of bisphosphonate use, inadequate bone volume for implant placement, and allergies to potential test foods such as peanuts

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026