None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
Background. It is estimated that over 300,000 Australians have heart failure (HF) at any given time and the incidence increases with increase in life expectancy. The point prevalence of chronic heart failure (CHF) has been about 1% in people aged 50–59 years, 10% in people aged over 65 years, and over 50% in people aged above 85 years. Despite therapeutic advances, HF remains a disease with unacceptably high mortality rates, poor quality of life and massive socioeconomic cost. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF) previously known as diastolic heart failure accounts for about 50% of patients with heart failure. HF-PEF refers to a clinical syndrome of symptoms and clinical signs of HF, normal or near normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function (EF> 50%) and evidence of diastolic dysfunction in the form of abnormal LV filling and elevated filling pressures. This can be objectively confirmed on echocardiogram. There is no difference in morbidity between patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and those with preserved ejection fraction and some studies have shown similar mortality in the two conditions. The efficacy for beta blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and aldosterone antagonists is well established in the treatment of HF with reduced EF. The efficacy for these drugs in HF-PEF is not well established. The I-PRESERVE trial studied the effects of Irbesartan (ARB) in symptomatic patients with HF-PEF. 4128 patients were enrolled and followed up for 4 years. There was no improvement in outcomes in patients on Irbesartan. The CHARM preserved trial studied Candesartan in 3000 patients with HF-PEF for a period of 3 years. There was only a small reduction in hospital admissions for heart failure in the Candesartan group. The PEP-CHF trial assessed the efficacy of Perindopril (ACE-I) in 850 patients over the age of 70 with HF-PEF. At one year there were fewer unexpected hospital admissions for heart failure in the perindopril group although the trial when completed showed no difference in its primary end point. Although therapies have proven effective in reducing morbidity and mortality from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, mortality from HF-PEF remains unchanged. No therapies thus far have been proven to correct the abnormalities seen in HF-PEF, halt its progression, reduce its mortality or conclusively reduce its morbidity. Rationale. Reducing heart rate with Ivabradine will improve symptoms, exercise tolerance and LV relaxation in patients with HF-PEF Objectives. The primary objective of the study is to trial a novel agent in the treatment of HF-PEF as patients continue to be symptomatic on currently available medications. We propose to use Ivabradine which is a selective heart rate lowering agent in patients with HF-PEF and assess the effect on symptoms, exercise tolerance, echocardiographic and Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) imaging parameters of heart failure.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Age greater than or equal to 18 years HF-PEF (LVEF greater than or equal to 50% within 6m of randomisation) NYHA II-III Diastolic dysfunction on echo E/A equal to 1, E/E’ equal to or greater than 15, deceleration time less than or equal to 140ms Heart rate over 70/min Stable disease, confirmed by no hospital admissions or HF medication changes within 3m prior to randomisation Informed consent No other causes for exertional dyspnoea
Exclusion criteria
Atrial Fibrillation Contraindications to MRI Significant valvular or coronary disease as primary cause of HF Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, sarcoidosis GFR equal to or greater than 45 ml/min