Skip to content

The impact of cooking method on the physiological responses to a red meat meal.

In healthy young adults aged 20-25 years, does the ingestion of charred red meat, compared with slow cooking, elicit a significantly different physiological response.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12612000534886
Enrollment
12
Registered
2012-05-21
Start date
2012-06-25
Completion date
2012-07-19
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Red meat is a major component of the typical western diet. Despite providing between 30-50% of the daily intake of protein and an equivalent proportion of daily iron/zinc intake, red meat intake also positively correlates to colorectal cancer risk. The cancer risks from red meat depend in part on the cooking methods. Burnt, barbequed or red meat cooked at high temperatures have higher concentrations of a diverse array of pro-inflammatory, pro-oxidative and carcinogenic compounds including; heterocyclic amines (HCAs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ( PAHs) and N-nitroso compounds (NOCs). These potentially carcinogenic compounds are likely to initiate an oxidative stress response in the body. However, there is very limited data on what impact the methods of cooking red meat have on the digestion of the meat protein, and also responses elicited by hormonal and acute inflammatory pathways.

Interventions

A single meal of a 250g charred beef steak, 1.5 cm thick, cooked on a hot plate at 220-240oC for 4 minutes on each side, to a minimum internal temperature of 70oC and served with 20g tomato sauce on two slices of white bread. The meal consists of 3210 kJ, 37g fat, 30g carbohydrates and 77g protein. The meal is consumed for breakfast after an overnight fast (10pm to 8am). Following a two week wash-out period, participants will consume the un-charred beef meal as a control.

Sponsors

David Cameron-Smith
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Crossover
Primary purpose
Prevention
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male
Age
20 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Aged 20-25 years old Non-vegetarian No known allergy to gluten

Exclusion criteria

Vegetarian Food allergy to gluten Family history of diabetes Family history of heart disease Anti-inflammatory pharmaceutical use BMI >30

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026