Skip to content

The relationship between movement of individual vertebrae and symptoms in patients with neck pain

For people with neck pain receiving manual therapy treatment, how does their segmental mobility alter in relation to improvements in active range of movement?

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12612000262808
Enrollment
18
Registered
2012-03-05
Start date
2018-06-28
Completion date
2018-10-31
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Aims: Determine how, in people with neck pain, segmental spinal mobility changes following manual therapy. Background: Little is known about the specific mechanisms underlying neck pain, the subsequent limitation of movement, or the mechanisms of manual therapy interventions. There has been an international focus on improving the understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of spinal pain and on the pathophysiological effects of treatment to improve patient outcomes and reduce the cost and disability associated with spinal pain. One way of accessing this problem is to investigate what aspects of the person's condition changes when they improve following an intervention. Recently, methods involving MRI have become available that will allow such investigations to occur. Experimental procedure: Participants will be required to: (i) Undergo a standard physiotherapy assessment which includes taking a patient history and conducting a physical examination to ensure the patient is suitable for manual therapy treatment and that they have a limitation of rotation of at least 10 degrees. (ii) Attend Allamanda Private Hospital or a local radiology facility for assessment and treatment. Here one MRI of the cervical spine examination will be performed. (iii) Following the MRI, pain and range of rotation will be measured. One therapist will perform a palpation assessment. One segment considered to be contributing to the patient’s symptoms will be marked by taping a 0.8mm diameter sphere that will be visible on the fluoroscopic images. A second therapist will apply a manual therapy treatment for up to 4 mins to the segment selected. The treatment will be repeated until there is an increase of greater than 10 degrees in rotation or up to a maximum of 8 mins, whichever comes first. A second fluoroscopic examination will then be conducted.

Interventions

Participants will receive manual therapy treatment for up to eight minutes on one occasion. The treatment will be localised mobilisation to one intervertebral location involving oscillatory movements and will not include high velocity thrusts. Treatment will be performed by a titled musculoskeletal physiotherapist who is registered to practice in Australia.

Sponsors

Griffith University School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomised trial
Intervention model
Single group
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria will be similar to our previous studies for the symptomatic groups i.e. local neck pain for more than two weeks duration. Active neck rotation will be limited by more than 15 degrees to one side producing less than 4/10 pain at the limit of movement and findings on motion palpation of increased stiffness at a location corresponding to their symptoms.

Exclusion criteria

For all groups, exclusion criteria will be a current third party claim, a history of trauma within the previous six months, any contraindications to treatment by manual therapy, or any contraindications to having a CT scan such as pregnancy, previous exposure to ionising radiation etc.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026