Skip to content

Teleaudiology: evaluation of teleconsultation efficacy for hearing aid fittings

Teleaudiology: evaluation of teleconsultation efficacy for hearing aid fittings

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12612000208808
Enrollment
50
Registered
2012-02-20
Start date
2010-02-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Purpose: To evaluate teleconsultation´s efficacy for hearing aid (HA) fittings. Methods: 50 hearing impaired individuals with age ranging from 39 to 88 years and ISO mean of audiometric thresholds between 30 and 68,7 dBHL participated in this study. The participants were divided in two groups by means of randomized stratification: control group (n=25), submitted to face to face procedures and experimental (n=25), submitted to synchronous teleconsultation with interactive video and remote application control. Following the consultations, an evaluator, blinded regarding the groups, performed the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT-Brazil). Nearly a month following the consultations, this evaluator analyzed the daily time of HA use (datalogging) and administered the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA). Results: A greater time for the programming and verification and a smaller time for HA orientation were observed for the experimental group. No difference was found between the groups for the total consultation time in minutes. The real ear measures matching to targets were similar for the both groups. No significant difference was observed between the groups for the HINT results (Speech Reception Thresholds in silence as well as the signal to noise ratio), the daily amount HA use in hours and the IOI-HA scores. Conclusion: Teleconsultation is efficacious for HA programming, verification and fitting when face to face services are not available.

Interventions

The aim of this study was to evaluate teleconsultation´s efficacy for hearing aid (HA) fittings. 50 hearing impaired individuals with age ranging from 39 to 88 years and ISO mean of audiometric thresholds between 30 and 68,7 dBHL participated in this study. The participants were divided in two groups by means of randomized stratification: control group or active group (n=25), submitted to face to face procedures and experimental or intervention group(n=25), submitted to synchronous teleconsultat

The aim of this study was to evaluate teleconsultation´s efficacy for hearing aid (HA) fittings. 50 hearing impaired individuals with age ranging from 39 to 88 years and ISO mean of audiometric thresholds between 30 and 68,7 dBHL participated in this study. The participants were divided in two groups by means of randomized stratification: control group or active group (n=25), submitted to face to face procedures and experimental or intervention group(n=25), submitted to synchronous teleconsultation with interactive video and remote application control. Following the consultations, an evaluator, blinded regarding the groups, performed the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT-Brazil). Nearly a month following the consultations, this evaluator analyzed the daily time of HA use (datalogging) and administered the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA). In order to evaluate the teleconsultation’s efficacy, the following elements were analyzed and compared to face to face procedures: - the time for hearing aid programming, for real ear measurements and for the orientation - the total time of the face to face and teleconsultation’s procedures - the results of real ear measurements - the HINT results - the IOI-HA results - the datalogging analyses The difference between the face to face and the teleconsultation procedures was that in the second one, the procedures for hearing aid programming, real ear measurements and orientation were conducted by means the remote control of the devices. The Polycom PVX version 8.0.2 software was used to make the remote control and for the videoconferencing. The audiologist whit experience in the procedures for hearing aid fitting was 300 meters away from the test environment. The procedures were facilitated by a graduate student or professional without experience in the hearing aid fitting. The facilitator followed the procedures and informed the audiologist about problems that could happen during the teleconsultation. Just after the face to face and teleconsultation procedures, an evaluator, blinded regarging to the procedures, carried out the HINT test. After a month of the procedures, the blinded evaluator asses the IOI-HA questionnaire and the hearing aid’s datalogging. It was just one session for one hour and a half for both groups.

Sponsors

Patricia Danieli Campos
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
39 Years to 88 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Hearing impaired individuals with indication for hearing aids. Sensorioneural hearing loss without previous experience with the hearing aids

Exclusion criteria

People with normal hearing or conductive hearing loss. Children.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026