Skip to content

Is more better? Does a more intensive physiotherapy programme result in a more accelerated recovery for patients following trauma.

Is more better? Does a more intensive physiotherapy programme result in a more accelerated recovery for patients following trauma.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12611001231932
Enrollment
90
Registered
2011-12-01
Start date
2011-10-25
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The Alfred Hospital Trauma Service admits over 5000 patients per year with 1 in 5 deemed to have suffered major trauma (Trauma Registry, The Alfred, Trauma Audit 2010). Acute hospital care must be as efficient and effective as possible, given the high demand and the current pressure on inpatient beds. The doctors stabilise the patient medically and surgically as soon as possible, while the allied health team prepares the patient physically, psychologically and socially for timely discharge. For the trauma physiotherapists this involves treating patients in the emergency department, the intensive care unit and the ward. Despite dedicated clinical resources, trauma patient care may be impacted on by other acute care priorities and this can result in sub-optimal patient recovery and delayed discharge. A recent audit (2010) undertaken in the trauma service at The Alfred revealed only 33% of patients who could sit out of bed for meals, actually did so. We hypothesize that inadequate resources and low patient self confidence results in an unacceptable achievement of simple daily tasks after trauma. The optimal intensity / frequency of physiotherapy intervention for trauma patients in the acute care is unclear. Studies have shown early and intensive physiotherapy to be safe following stroke (Bernhardt et al 2008) and within the intensive care context (Schweickert et al 2008, Hopkins et al 2009). It also assists with functional independence and discharge destination gains following acquired brain injury (Turner-Stokes et al 2005), femoral fracture (Oldmeadow et al 2006, Pendleton et al 2007) and ankle fracture (Kimmel et al 2010). The goal of the physiotherapy intervention in the acute hospital is to prepare the patient physically for discharge to the community, commonly detailed as independence in transfers and ambulation (with or without a gait aid) and the ability to safely negotiate steps. These criteria are achieved through a regime of strengthening exercises and gait retraining. It seems reasonable to hypothesise that success may be enhanced by increasing the patients opportunity to practice these skills and may result in improved functional ability, a shorter hospital length of stay and more discharges directly home. Information regarding the optimal intensity / frequency of physiotherapy input will inform appropriate resource allocation to ensure maximum benefit for the patient, their families and the health care system.

Interventions

Physiotherapy intervention Usual care physiotherapy (once /day) PLUS an extra 2 physiotherapy sessions/day (two half hour sessions one on one with a physiotherapist) for every patient in the intervention group until they are discharged from the hospital or achieve physical readiness for discharge home. The intervention group will receive daily physiotherapy as per the usual care group as well 2 additional daily treatments, 7 days per week. One treatment will involve attending a ward based gym an

Physiotherapy intervention Usual care physiotherapy (once /day) PLUS an extra 2 physiotherapy sessions/day (two half hour sessions one on one with a physiotherapist) for every patient in the intervention group until they are discharged from the hospital or achieve physical readiness for discharge home. The intervention group will receive daily physiotherapy as per the usual care group as well 2 additional daily treatments, 7 days per week. One treatment will involve attending a ward based gym and undertaking a supervised exercise programme tailored to the individual; standing, balance and strength exercises, stretches, walking in the rails etc as appropriate. The second treatment will be a follow up from the usual care treatment with the aim being improvement in the functional tasks achieved during the morning (usual) physiotherapy session. Improvement would be measured as an increase in independence achieved, change in gait aid used (eg progression from gutter frame to pick up frame to crutches), specific tasks achieved / attempted (eg progression from transfers to ambulation to stairs) and progression in distance walked. If the patient is located in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), they will receive both extra sessions in ICU as the gym area is only accessible to ward patients.

Sponsors

The Alfred
Lead SponsorHospital

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Admission to The Alfred Trauma Service and deemed physically unsafe for discharge home on the day of first mobilisation by the physiotherapist

Exclusion criteria

Patients will be excluded from the study if they have no physical injuries, age < 18, unable to participate in active therapy sessions secondary to severe neurological or cognitive impairment (including pre-morbid dementia, severe head injuries), non-English speaking, an injury profile rendering the patient unable to mobilise (take steps / walk due to fracture pattern eg. bilaterally non-weight bearing secondary to pelvic fractures), patients who required assistance to mobilise prior to the accident (use of a cane or walker not an exclusion), patients admitted from a nursing home, spinal cord injuries and those with >20% burn injuries

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026