Skip to content

Effect of Face-to-Face vs. E-mail Communication on Fitness and Quality of Life in an Employee-Based Walking Program

Among employees enrolled in a work-based walking program, is e-mail communication comparable to face-to-face communication for fitness and quality of life outcomes?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12611000966998
Enrollment
20
Registered
2011-09-08
Start date
2010-08-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

E-mail delivery of workplace wellness programming has become an increasingly popular, cost-effective, and efficient means of disseminating information. In light of that trend, this study compared the effect of face-to-face interventions and email interventions on fitness, quality of life, and maintenance of an exercise program in order to study the effect of communication style on intervention outcomes.

Interventions

The 10-week walking program began by requiring participants to engage in 20 minutes of moderate intensity walking, defined by a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) of 12, 3 days per week. RPE is a validated scale for self-regulation of exercise intensity. An RPE rating of 12-13 corresponds with "somewhat hard" exercise, and approximately 60% Heart Rate Reserve. On alternating weeks, the required walks increased in either intensity (RPE 14) or duration (5 minutes). By the of the 10 week program,

The 10-week walking program began by requiring participants to engage in 20 minutes of moderate intensity walking, defined by a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) of 12, 3 days per week. RPE is a validated scale for self-regulation of exercise intensity. An RPE rating of 12-13 corresponds with "somewhat hard" exercise, and approximately 60% Heart Rate Reserve. On alternating weeks, the required walks increased in either intensity (RPE 14) or duration (5 minutes). By the of the 10 week program, participants were walking for 45 minutes a day, 4 days per week, at an RPE of 14. The intervention group had a face-to-face meeting with the researcher once a week. During these small group meetings (3-4 participants plus the instructor), the subjects completed one of their weekly walks with the researcher and were provided with verbal feedback based on a physical copy of a weekly workout log returned to the instructor. They were also provided with verbal encouragement and instruction for the next week.

Sponsors

Messiah College Department of Health and Human PErformance
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Prevention
Masking
Blinded (masking used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
42 Years to 56 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Previously sedentary/low-active Messiah College Employees

Exclusion criteria

Already moderately/high active individuals or individuals not cleared to participate in moderate intensity exercise

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026