Skip to content

Using a biodegradable polyurethane foam in comparison with Granufoam (black, non-biodegradable foam) with Vacuum-Assisted Closure in the management of decubitus ulcers (pressure sores)

Safety and efficacy of vacuum assisted closure with a biodegradable polyurethane foam versus Granufoam in pressure sore sufferers.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12611000815965
Enrollment
20
Registered
2011-08-03
Start date
2012-03-04
Completion date
2013-01-24
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Comparison of new biodegradable foam against commercially available non-biodegradable foam under topical negative pressure dressings for safety and efficacy in transmitting the vacuum to the wound bed.

Interventions

New biodegradable polyurethane foam under topical negative pressure in standard treatment regimen (foams changed every 2-3 days) for 8 weeks.

Sponsors

NovoWound Pty Ltd
Lead SponsorCommercial sector/Industry

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Ischial or sacral pressure sore; >18 years old; suitable for topical negative pressure after wound debridement; able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Pregnancy; inability to provide informed consent

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026