Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of a Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA) Electronic Support Tool

Multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing the effect of general practitioner utilisation of a TIA electronic decision support tool in the management of TIA/minor stroke patients versus usual care on the subsequent 90 day stroke risk, degree of guideline adherence, and overall treatment costs.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12611000792921
Acronym
FASTEST
Enrollment
40
Registered
2011-07-28
Start date
2012-02-24
Completion date
2013-05-15
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The primary purpose of this study is o assess the efficacy and safety of the transient ischaemic attack (TIA)/Stroke electronic decision support (EDS) tool. The study will focus on the effects of EDS use in the GP setting on stroke prevention, national guideline adherence, potentially associated risks, and cost compared with routine care.

Interventions

Utilisation of a TIA electronic decision support (EDS) tool during the management of patients suspected of having suffered a TIA or stroke. The tool is a web based module that GPs access by clicking a menu button situated on the navigation bar of their practice management software that links them to the software provider (BPAC.Inc) module site. From there they select the TIA/Stroke EDS tool from a menu. Once selected a single page of tick boxes opens up for GPs to complete covering items such a

Utilisation of a TIA electronic decision support (EDS) tool during the management of patients suspected of having suffered a TIA or stroke. The tool is a web based module that GPs access by clicking a menu button situated on the navigation bar of their practice management software that links them to the software provider (BPAC.Inc) module site. From there they select the TIA/Stroke EDS tool from a menu. Once selected a single page of tick boxes opens up for GPs to complete covering items such as relevant aspects of history of presenting illness and a brief focused physical examination. Fields for relevant past medical history (e.g. diabetes and smoking history) are automatically populated by extracting data directly from the practice management system. Completing the page of background and clinical presentation data takes approximately 2-5 minutes depending on the GP’s familiarity with the tool. Based on this information the software confirms or rejects TIA/stroke as the likely diagnosis. If TIA or stroke is confirmed a triage recommendation is generated based on a validated risk score (ABCD2) supplemented by several other variables taken from the New Zealand TIA guidelines and clinical experience. If patients are triaged into the “low risk” category GPs are offered the option of either referring them to a specialist TIA clinic or to manage the patients themselves in the community. If community management is selected a step by step outline is provided with links to pre-populated relevant prescriptions, radiology referral forms, and life-style information leaflets. If patients are triaged into the “high risk” category GPs are advised to refer them to hospital for specialist assessment and diagnostic work-up to be achieved within 24 hours and GPs are not offered the community management option. However, if a GP feels that ED referral is not appropriate in any given situation (e.g. the patient refuses to attend ED) then the GP has the option to override this recommendation and refer patients to an outpatient specialist TIA clinic instead, as long as a reason for overriding the recommendation is specified. Referrals to hospital are automatically generated and contain all required information to allow the specialist to prioritise them appropriately. In the case of a hyper-acute stroke that is within the 4.5 hour thrombolysis window the tool is immediately aborted and the GP is advised to call 111 for emergent hospital transfer to a centre where stroke thrombolysis is available. A GP sees on average 1 TIA patient per month which also represents the average anticipated frequency of EDS use. Each TIA presentations requires only a single use of the EDS.

Sponsors

Dr Annemarei Ranta
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Prevention
Masking
Blinded (masking used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
0 to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

GP willingness to be a) randomised to either intervention or placebo group, b) GP willingness to register ALL patients suspected of having a TIA, c) GP practice equipped with electronic medical record system that interfaces with EDS format

Exclusion criteria

Prior use/familiarity with the TIA EDS tool. Location outside of the designated study areas (Hawke's Bay, Whanganui, and Southern DHB)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Mar 25, 2026