Quality of life measures after single access Vs Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Prospective Randomized Study.

Conventional Laparoscopic Versus Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy to measure postoperative pain, analgesia and cosmetic results in patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis

Status

Completed

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

ANZCTR

Registry ID

ACTRN12611000670976

Enrollment

Registered

2011-07-04

Start date

2009-11-06

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

it is suggested that single incision cholecystectomy is safe and feasible alternative to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy . we conducted this study prospectively in a randomized way to prove such benifits

Interventions

single incision cholecystectomy versus conventional cholecystectomy over 50 patients 25 each, the 1st group patients included 25 cases and laparoscopic cholecystectomy was done for them using single transumblical incision while the 2nd group included 25 cases and standard 4 ports cholecystectomy was done for them

Study design

Allocation

Randomised controlled trial

Intervention model

Parallel

Primary purpose

Treatment

Masking

Blinded (masking used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 70 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

All patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis verified by abdominal ultrasonography, who were scheduled for elective cholecystectomy and were fit for general anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria

acute cholecystitis, abnormal liver function tests, those found to have a contracted or thickened gallbladder on the ultrasound examination, BMI above 35 kg/m2, whose American Society of Anesthesiologists classification above 3 and those with previous laparotomy

Outcome results