Skip to content

To investigate patient's outcome using different hemofilter materials in those with sepsis associated acute renal failure

The effect of PMMA versus PS membrane on mortality in patients with septic acute kidney injury receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12611000652976
Enrollment
25
Registered
2011-06-24
Start date
2012-05-17
Completion date
2017-04-30
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Acute kidney injury (AKI) affects 5% to 7% of all hospitalized patients. Sepsis and septic shock remain the most important cause of AKI in critically ill patients and account for more than 50% of cases of AKI in the intensive care unit. The Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative has developed a consensus definition of AKI that uses the acronym RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss and End stage). Septic AKI is AKI occurring in the simultaneous presence of both the RIFLE criteria for AKI and the consensus criteria for sepsis, in the absence of other clear and established, non–sepsis-related (e.g., radiocontrast, other nephrotoxins) cause of AKI. It is widely accepted that cytokines play an important role in the pathogenesis of sepsis and septic shock. Cytokines removal by varies blood purification techniques like high volume hemofiltration and plasmaphresis may be useful in these situations. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) membrane hemofilter remove cytokines from blood mainly by adsorption to membrane matrix of the hemofilter. This special membrane characteristic is absence in Polyacrylonitrate (PAN) or Polysulfone (PS) membrane hemofilter commonly used for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Studies showed that using PMMA based CRRT in patient with septic AKI may associate with early improvement of hemodynamics, oxygenation and improvement of urine output. When compared with PAN based CRRT, patients treated with PMMA based CRRT showed significant 28-days mortality benefit (61.5% vs. 15.4%). The aim of this study is to investigate whether citrate post-dilution continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) using PMMA based hemofilter (PMMA-CVVH) in the treatment of patient with septic AKI provide better clinical outcome compared with CVVH using polysulfone based hemofilter (PS-CVVH)

Interventions

Citrate continuous venovenous hemofiltration using Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) membrane hemofilter during acute kidney injury period until death or discharge from ICU

Sponsors

Department of intensive care, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital
Lead SponsorHospital

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Severe sepsis (defined based on ACCP/ SCCM criteria, ie Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome in the presence of suspected or known infection, leading to organ dysfunction), and 2. Acute kidney injury (defined based on RIFLE criteria, “Injury” grade or above, who required continuous venovenous hemofiltration support)

Exclusion criteria

1. Contraindication for regional citrate anticoagulation (Liver failure or cirrhosis with impaired citrate metabolism, allergy to citrate) 2. Pregnancy 3. Terminal illness

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026